Timeline for factorization of polynomials wrt the major index stat
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 5, 2016 at 21:34 | vote | accept | T. Amdeberhan | ||
Dec 5, 2016 at 21:17 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | Is not my counterexample to maj version correct? For a permutation $(k+2,\dots,n,1,\dots,k+1)$ we get $x$ in too small power, no? | |
Dec 5, 2016 at 18:45 | comment | added | T. Amdeberhan | Sure. We'll check then. | |
Dec 5, 2016 at 16:56 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | Now I start to doubt that it is true for maj, please see my answer. | |
Dec 5, 2016 at 15:00 | comment | added | T. Amdeberhan | Thanks, Fedor. In that case, we need more work for the "maj" problem. | |
Dec 5, 2016 at 14:58 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | For $k=1$ even the common distribution of $(maj,\pi_n)$ is the same as a common distribution of $(inv,\pi_n)$. For $k=2$ the common distribution of $(maj,\pi_{n-1}+\pi_n)$ is not already the same as a common distribution of $(inv,\pi_{n-1}+\pi_n)$, which may be seen from the case $\pi_{n-1}+\pi_n=2n-1$. | |
Dec 3, 2016 at 19:33 | history | edited | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
Dec 3, 2016 at 18:15 | history | edited | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
Dec 3, 2016 at 17:01 | history | edited | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 473 characters in body
|
Dec 3, 2016 at 8:52 | answer | added | Fedor Petrov | timeline score: 5 | |
Dec 3, 2016 at 8:38 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | Why this replacement does not affect $Q$? | |
Dec 3, 2016 at 5:53 | history | edited | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 95 characters in body
|
Dec 3, 2016 at 5:48 | history | asked | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |