Timeline for Moreau-Enveloppe from $L^2(0,T;V) \to L^2(0,T;V^*)$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2016 at 20:59 | history | edited | malwin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited some typos.
|
| Dec 6, 2016 at 20:45 | vote | accept | malwin | ||
| Dec 3, 2016 at 18:39 | answer | added | gerw | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 2, 2016 at 18:31 | comment | added | malwin | I reformulated my question. Can you now understand my question? Thanks. | |
| Dec 2, 2016 at 18:30 | history | edited | malwin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
total reformulation
|
| Dec 2, 2016 at 18:00 | comment | added | Christian Clason | I mean: why can't you consider it as a mapping from $L^2(0,T;V)$ to $L^2(0,T;V^*)$? I assume that's where it is defined, otherwise the question of boundedness does not make sense. (You didn't tell us the definition of the mapping you're considering, so it's hard to understand what you mean here.) | |
| Dec 2, 2016 at 17:58 | comment | added | malwin | I don't understand what you mean with "weak theory" in this context. Why is the Moreau-Enveloppe a well-defined mapping from $L^2(0,T;V)$ to it's dual? How can we apply the boundedness of it as a mapping from $V$ to $V^*$? Thank you for your reply! | |
| Dec 2, 2016 at 17:10 | comment | added | Christian Clason | Under mild conditions on $V$, $L^2(0,T;V^*)$ is the dual of $L^2(0,T;V)$, so the abstract theory should apply? | |
| Dec 2, 2016 at 13:19 | history | asked | malwin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |