Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 17, 2021 at 19:57 comment added Thomas Benjamin Why the downvote?
Dec 3, 2016 at 8:53 comment added Thomas Benjamin (cont.) of $L^{2}_{\omega}$). One might use Henkin models of $L^{2}_{\kappa}$ as the means to study such consistency results. Regarding the heuristic that "tells you where to draw the line"--finding such a heuristic would be an integral part of developing the "research program".
Dec 3, 2016 at 8:40 comment added Thomas Benjamin @CameronZwarich: Regarding extendible cardinals, note the forward direction ($\Rightarrow$) of Magidor's Thm. 4: If $\kappa$ is extendible then $L^{2}_{\kappa}$ is $\kappa$-compact. This suggests (to me at least) the following: if one can show the relative consistency of some theory $T$+ "There exists an extendible cardinal" in which one can interpret $L^{2}_{\kappa}$ , one can prove $T$+"There exists an extendible cardinal"$\vDash$$L^{2}_{\kappa}$ is $\kappa$-compact (Question: can $\omega$ be deemed an extendible cardinal? If not, then one can use Thm. 4 to prove the non-compactness
Dec 3, 2016 at 4:50 comment added Cameron Zwarich That's an interesting approach, and it certainly seems more sensible to describe large cardinals via model-theoretic properties than the usual definitions. In the case of extendible cardinals, it's interesting that the property asserted for $\kappa$ is even stronger than that of $\omega$, because compactness fails quite badly for $L^2_\omega$. Can it provide an answer by which to judge the consistency of these new model-theoretic axioms? I assume you can come up with some that are obviously inconsistent, but is there a heuristic that tells you where to draw the line?
Dec 2, 2016 at 13:30 history edited Thomas Benjamin CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected spelling
Dec 2, 2016 at 12:15 history edited Thomas Benjamin CC BY-SA 3.0
completed answer
Dec 2, 2016 at 11:14 history answered Thomas Benjamin CC BY-SA 3.0