Timeline for Localization of a symmetric monoidal category is monoidal when the morphisms being inverted are closed under tensor product
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 8, 2019 at 1:14 | answer | added | Adrien Vakili | timeline score: 1 | |
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
Feb 28, 2017 at 22:27 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jan 29, 2017 at 21:43 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Dec 30, 2016 at 20:55 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Nov 30, 2016 at 16:10 | answer | added | David White | timeline score: 2 | |
Nov 30, 2016 at 16:10 | comment | added | David White | Note that using the "@" here will not send a notification to Neil Strickland, since he has nothing to do with this post. | |
Nov 30, 2016 at 14:01 | comment | added | kousaka | @user337830 Your explanation is very understandable, thanks a lot!!! | |
Nov 30, 2016 at 12:47 | comment | added | user337830 | The universal property used here is that of the functor $L_S\times L_S:\mathcal{M}\times\mathcal{M}\to \mathcal{M}[S^{-1}]\times\mathcal{M}[S^{-1}]$. | |
Nov 30, 2016 at 12:45 | comment | added | user337830 | You may would like to ask this question on math.stackexchange instead. Anyway, the assumption that $S$ is closed with respect to the monoidal product $\otimes$ implies that the composition of the localisation functor $L_S:\mathcal{M}\to \mathcal{M}[S^{-1}]$ with $\otimes$ sends a pair morphisms $(s,t)$ in $S\times S$ to an isomorphisms in $\mathcal{M}[S^{-1}]$. Thus, the composition $L_S\circ \otimes$ factorises through $L_S\times L_S$, defining the desired monoidal product on $\mathcal{M}[S^{-1}]\times\mathcal{M}[S^{-1}]$. | |
Nov 30, 2016 at 10:23 | comment | added | kousaka | I would appreciate it a lot if you could favour to answer this question..@Neil Strickland | |
Nov 30, 2016 at 10:22 | review | First posts | |||
Nov 30, 2016 at 10:58 | |||||
Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 | history | asked | kousaka | CC BY-SA 3.0 |