Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 22, 2019 at 17:59 answer added Theo Johnson-Freyd timeline score: 9
Jun 9, 2016 at 14:34 history edited Jim Humphreys CC BY-SA 3.0
added 24 characters in body
Jun 9, 2016 at 14:32 comment added Jim Humphreys @brunch: Yes, I tend to forget this essential dualization, so I've edited my question. (Note that you need to add 1 to the sum of coefficients, which in the Kac definition comes from the "extra" node in the affine setting.)
Jun 8, 2016 at 0:05 comment added brunoh I suspect there is a typo in your question : the dual Coxeter number is the sum of coefficients of the highest short coroot not of the highest short root.
Dec 18, 2011 at 4:27 answer added brandyn timeline score: 3
Feb 28, 2011 at 16:19 comment added Jim Humphreys @Skip: Belated thanks for your comment. I had forgotten about that discussion in S-S, which was aimed at computing the discriminant of the Killing form relative to a Chevalley basis. Leaving aside their notational choices, this adds weight to the argument that the "dual Coxeter number" doesn't really need a name but only a symbol such as the currently common $h^\vee$ together with a brief reminder of what the symbol means.
Jun 4, 2010 at 16:05 comment added Skip Just a historical note to add to the dates mentioned above: The dual Coxeter number makes an appearance in Springer-Steinberg's 1970 paper "Conjugacy classes" on pages E-12 through E-15, where it is defined and used to calculate the Killing form on the Cartan subalgebra.
May 24, 2010 at 15:01 vote accept Jim Humphreys
May 23, 2010 at 22:33 answer added Peter Tingley timeline score: 9
May 23, 2010 at 16:06 answer added David Ben-Zvi timeline score: 28
May 22, 2010 at 18:59 answer added Bruce Westbury timeline score: 1
May 22, 2010 at 17:52 history asked Jim Humphreys CC BY-SA 2.5