Timeline for Is there a crossing-free planar embedding of the 2-skeleton of the 6-simplex?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2016 at 8:30 | history | edited | domotorp | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed first line to Jordan curve to adopt to new version of quesiton
|
| Nov 27, 2016 at 19:04 | comment | added | Jeff Strom | Good plan: done. | |
| Nov 27, 2016 at 19:03 | history | edited | Jeff Strom | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 65 characters in body
|
| Nov 27, 2016 at 19:03 | comment | added | domotorp | Sure, though maybe you could add to the beginning that this is for a slightly different version of the problem. | |
| Nov 27, 2016 at 18:08 | comment | added | Jeff Strom | Ah! Anyway, I'll leave my answer because it's kind of interesting. | |
| Nov 27, 2016 at 16:49 | comment | added | domotorp | I've also added a clarification to the problem. | |
| Nov 27, 2016 at 16:47 | comment | added | domotorp | Say, I want each body to be a polygon. | |
| Nov 27, 2016 at 16:46 | comment | added | Jeff Strom | Ok. Probably you could be more clear, since the boundaries here are vertical segments and isolated points, hardly pathological. | |
| Nov 27, 2016 at 16:44 | comment | added | domotorp | Sorry, but when I said nice boundary, I meant no tricks like this. | |
| Nov 27, 2016 at 16:43 | history | edited | Jeff Strom | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed from $3$-tupes to $k$-tuples, added comment about embedding hypergraphs
|
| Nov 27, 2016 at 15:27 | history | answered | Jeff Strom | CC BY-SA 3.0 |