Timeline for D-modules over algebraic curves VS differential Galois theory
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Dec 3, 2016 at 13:44 | history | bounty ended | Saal Hardali | ||
| S Dec 3, 2016 at 13:44 | history | notice removed | Saal Hardali | ||
| Dec 3, 2016 at 13:44 | vote | accept | Saal Hardali | ||
| Dec 3, 2016 at 13:43 | vote | accept | Saal Hardali | ||
| Dec 3, 2016 at 13:44 | |||||
| Dec 1, 2016 at 16:49 | answer | added | Will Sawin | timeline score: 9 | |
| Nov 30, 2016 at 4:08 | comment | added | Henry.L | A possibly helpful discussion here. mathoverflow.net/questions/201853/… | |
| Nov 28, 2016 at 21:50 | comment | added | Saal Hardali | @WillSawin Thanks. If you would flesh it out into an answer and perhaps give a sketch of a "proof" for the positive statement I'd accept that | |
| Nov 28, 2016 at 16:54 | comment | added | Will Sawin | In addition to what you mentioned, about singulariities, and what Avi mentioned, differential Galois theory can be done on higher-dimensional varieties (as can D-module theory, of course). I think those are the primary differences - D-modules on curves, ignoring singualrities, are the same as representations of the differential Galois group of curves of extensions arising from linear differential equations on the curve. | |
| Nov 26, 2016 at 21:46 | comment | added | Avi Steiner | I think differential Galois theory studies in particular differential polynomials. These aren't in general linear differential operators. | |
| Nov 26, 2016 at 14:52 | history | edited | Saal Hardali | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 13 characters in body
|
| S Nov 25, 2016 at 16:15 | history | bounty started | Saal Hardali | ||
| S Nov 25, 2016 at 16:15 | history | notice added | Saal Hardali | Draw attention | |
| Nov 23, 2016 at 13:44 | history | edited | Saal Hardali | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 145 characters in body
|
| Nov 23, 2016 at 13:38 | history | asked | Saal Hardali | CC BY-SA 3.0 |