Skip to main content
Better link syntax
Source Link
David Roberts
  • 35.4k
  • 11
  • 124
  • 349

A recent article in the online science magazine Quanta  , https://www.quantamagazine.org/20161115-strange-numbers-found-in-particle-collisions/Strange Numbers Found in Particle Collisions, discusses experimental evidence of a connection between Feynman integrals and periods of motives. Although Quanta usually does a great job with expository articles, in this case so much simplification was necessary for the lay reader that I was left wanting more; a lot more.

Can anyone add more detail to the article, or point me towards another, more in depth exposition?

A recent article in the online science magazine Quanta  https://www.quantamagazine.org/20161115-strange-numbers-found-in-particle-collisions/ discusses experimental evidence of a connection between Feynman integrals and periods of motives. Although Quanta usually does a great job with expository articles, in this case so much simplification was necessary for the lay reader that I was left wanting more; a lot more.

Can anyone add more detail to the article, or point me towards another, more in depth exposition?

A recent article in the online science magazine Quanta, Strange Numbers Found in Particle Collisions, discusses experimental evidence of a connection between Feynman integrals and periods of motives. Although Quanta usually does a great job with expository articles, in this case so much simplification was necessary for the lay reader that I was left wanting more; a lot more.

Can anyone add more detail to the article, or point me towards another, more in depth exposition?

Source Link
Stopple
  • 11.1k
  • 3
  • 43
  • 65

Feynman diagrams and periods of motives

A recent article in the online science magazine Quanta https://www.quantamagazine.org/20161115-strange-numbers-found-in-particle-collisions/ discusses experimental evidence of a connection between Feynman integrals and periods of motives. Although Quanta usually does a great job with expository articles, in this case so much simplification was necessary for the lay reader that I was left wanting more; a lot more.

Can anyone add more detail to the article, or point me towards another, more in depth exposition?