Timeline for "Albanese" schemes: When does an "initial abelian scheme" exist under a given scheme?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2021 at 8:39 | answer | added | Matthieu Romagny | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 4, 2009 at 19:35 | comment | added | Kevin Buzzard | Unhelpful stupid comment: "abelian scheme" is a relative notion. So really X should be a scheme over a base S (like in the answers). Otherwise someone could argue that X itself was an abelian scheme, of relative dimension 0, over the base X... | |
| Oct 28, 2009 at 4:31 | vote | accept | Andrew Critch | ||
| Oct 26, 2009 at 12:54 | answer | added | Tony Pantev | timeline score: 16 | |
| Oct 26, 2009 at 7:02 | answer | added | Lars | timeline score: 7 | |
| Oct 26, 2009 at 7:01 | answer | added | David Zureick-Brown | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 26, 2009 at 2:55 | history | edited | Andrew Critch | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
rephrase
|
| Oct 26, 2009 at 1:17 | history | asked | Andrew Critch | CC BY-SA 2.5 |