Skip to main content
added 80 characters in body
Source Link
Li Yutong
  • 3.5k
  • 16
  • 34

We say that a set of varieties $S$ lives in a bounded family if there exists a projective morphism $\mathcal{X} \to T$ between varieties of finite type, such that for any $X \in S$, there exists a closed point $t \in T$, such that its fibre $\mathcal{X}_t$ is isomorphic to $X$.

It seems that the following two facts related to bounded families used quite often without proof in the literature of birational geometry:

(1) If $S$ is a bounded family of $\mathbb{Q}$-Gorenstein varieties (we can assume the elements in $S$ are normal, have log terminal singularities), then there exists a universal $m$, such that for any $X \in S$, $mK_X$ is a Cartier divisor, i.e. the Gorenstein index is bounded.

(2) Granted (1) is true, then the volume (suppose $n=\dim X$) $${\rm vol}(mK_X): = \lim_{k \to +\infty}\frac{n! h^0(X, kmK_X)}{k^n}$$ is bounded for any $X \in S$.

If I know the universal family $\mathcal{X}$ is $\mathbb Q$-Gorenstein, then the above two results follows easily. But I don't know if we can assume this because such universal families typically come from Hilbert schemes (I don't know if Hilbert schemes are $\mathbb Q$-Gorenstein or not). The closest result related (1) which I can find is Theorem B.1 in the paper Log canonical thresholds on varieties with bounded singularities. But it requires more than what I have: the fibres are required to be normal.

However, I do think one needs something extra which natural comes from the construction of bounded family in order to make (1) and (2) holds. Any suggestion?

We say that a set of varieties $S$ lives in a bounded family if there exists a projective morphism $\mathcal{X} \to T$ between varieties of finite type, such that for any $X \in S$, there exists a closed point $t \in T$, such that its fibre $\mathcal{X}_t$ is isomorphic to $X$.

It seems that the following two facts related to bounded families used quite often without proof in the literature of birational geometry:

(1) If $S$ is a bounded family of $\mathbb{Q}$-Gorenstein varieties, then there exists a universal $m$, such that for any $X \in S$, $mK_X$ is a Cartier divisor, i.e. the Gorenstein index is bounded.

(2) Granted (1) is true, then the volume (suppose $n=\dim X$) $${\rm vol}(mK_X): = \lim_{k \to +\infty}\frac{n! h^0(X, kmK_X)}{k^n}$$ is bounded for any $X \in S$.

If I know the universal family $\mathcal{X}$ is $\mathbb Q$-Gorenstein, then the above two results follows easily. But I don't know if we can assume this because such universal families typically come from Hilbert schemes (I don't know if Hilbert schemes are $\mathbb Q$-Gorenstein or not). The closest result related (1) which I can find is Theorem B.1 in the paper Log canonical thresholds on varieties with bounded singularities. But it requires more than what I have: the fibres are required to be normal.

However, I do think one needs something extra which natural comes from the construction of bounded family in order to make (1) and (2) holds. Any suggestion?

We say that a set of varieties $S$ lives in a bounded family if there exists a projective morphism $\mathcal{X} \to T$ between varieties of finite type, such that for any $X \in S$, there exists a closed point $t \in T$, such that its fibre $\mathcal{X}_t$ is isomorphic to $X$.

It seems that the following two facts related to bounded families used quite often without proof in the literature of birational geometry:

(1) If $S$ is a bounded family of $\mathbb{Q}$-Gorenstein varieties (we can assume the elements in $S$ are normal, have log terminal singularities), then there exists a universal $m$, such that for any $X \in S$, $mK_X$ is a Cartier divisor, i.e. the Gorenstein index is bounded.

(2) Granted (1) is true, then the volume (suppose $n=\dim X$) $${\rm vol}(mK_X): = \lim_{k \to +\infty}\frac{n! h^0(X, kmK_X)}{k^n}$$ is bounded for any $X \in S$.

If I know the universal family $\mathcal{X}$ is $\mathbb Q$-Gorenstein, then the above two results follows easily. But I don't know if we can assume this because such universal families typically come from Hilbert schemes (I don't know if Hilbert schemes are $\mathbb Q$-Gorenstein or not). The closest result related (1) which I can find is Theorem B.1 in the paper Log canonical thresholds on varieties with bounded singularities. But it requires more than what I have: the fibres are required to be normal.

However, I do think one needs something extra which natural comes from the construction of bounded family in order to make (1) and (2) holds. Any suggestion?

deleted 53 characters in body
Source Link
Li Yutong
  • 3.5k
  • 16
  • 34

We say that a set of varieties $S$ lives in a bounded family if there exists a projective morphism $\mathcal{X} \to T$ between varieties of finite type, such that for any $X \in S$, there exists a closed point $t \in T$, such that its fibre $\mathcal{X}_t$ is isomorphic to $X$.

It seems that the following two facts related to bounded families used quite often without proof in the literature of birational geometry:

(1) If $S$ is a bounded family of $\mathbb{Q}$-Gorenstein varieties, then there exists a universal $m$, such that for any $X \in S$, $mK_X$ is a Cartier divisor, i.e. the Gorenstein index is bounded.

(2) Granted (1) is true, then the volume (suppose $n=\dim X$) $${\rm vol}(mK_X): = \lim_{k \to +\infty}\frac{n! h^0(X, kmK_X)}{k^n}$$ is bounded for any $X \in S$.

If I know the universal family $\mathcal{X}$ is $\mathbb Q$-Gorenstein, then the above two results follows easily. But I don't know if we can assume this because such universal families typically come from Hilbert schemes (I don't know if Hilbert schemes are $\mathbb Q$-Gorenstein or not). The closest result related (1) which I can find is Theorem B.1 in the paper Log canonical thresholds on varieties with bounded singularities. But it requires more than what I have: the fibres are required to be normal and the general fibre to have rational singularities.

However, I do think one needs something extra which natural comes from the construction of bounded family in order to make (1) and (2) holds. Any suggestion?

We say that a set of varieties $S$ lives in a bounded family if there exists a projective morphism $\mathcal{X} \to T$ between varieties of finite type, such that for any $X \in S$, there exists a closed point $t \in T$, such that its fibre $\mathcal{X}_t$ is isomorphic to $X$.

It seems that the following two facts related to bounded families used quite often without proof in the literature of birational geometry:

(1) If $S$ is a bounded family of $\mathbb{Q}$-Gorenstein varieties, then there exists a universal $m$, such that for any $X \in S$, $mK_X$ is a Cartier divisor, i.e. the Gorenstein index is bounded.

(2) Granted (1) is true, then the volume (suppose $n=\dim X$) $${\rm vol}(mK_X): = \lim_{k \to +\infty}\frac{n! h^0(X, kmK_X)}{k^n}$$ is bounded for any $X \in S$.

If I know the universal family $\mathcal{X}$ is $\mathbb Q$-Gorenstein, then the above two results follows easily. But I don't know if we can assume this because such universal families typically come from Hilbert schemes (I don't know if Hilbert schemes are $\mathbb Q$-Gorenstein or not). The closest result related (1) which I can find is Theorem B.1 in the paper Log canonical thresholds on varieties with bounded singularities. But it requires more than what I have: the fibres are required to be normal and the general fibre to have rational singularities.

However, I do think one needs something extra which natural comes from the construction of bounded family in order to make (1) and (2) holds. Any suggestion?

We say that a set of varieties $S$ lives in a bounded family if there exists a projective morphism $\mathcal{X} \to T$ between varieties of finite type, such that for any $X \in S$, there exists a closed point $t \in T$, such that its fibre $\mathcal{X}_t$ is isomorphic to $X$.

It seems that the following two facts related to bounded families used quite often without proof in the literature of birational geometry:

(1) If $S$ is a bounded family of $\mathbb{Q}$-Gorenstein varieties, then there exists a universal $m$, such that for any $X \in S$, $mK_X$ is a Cartier divisor, i.e. the Gorenstein index is bounded.

(2) Granted (1) is true, then the volume (suppose $n=\dim X$) $${\rm vol}(mK_X): = \lim_{k \to +\infty}\frac{n! h^0(X, kmK_X)}{k^n}$$ is bounded for any $X \in S$.

If I know the universal family $\mathcal{X}$ is $\mathbb Q$-Gorenstein, then the above two results follows easily. But I don't know if we can assume this because such universal families typically come from Hilbert schemes (I don't know if Hilbert schemes are $\mathbb Q$-Gorenstein or not). The closest result related (1) which I can find is Theorem B.1 in the paper Log canonical thresholds on varieties with bounded singularities. But it requires more than what I have: the fibres are required to be normal.

However, I do think one needs something extra which natural comes from the construction of bounded family in order to make (1) and (2) holds. Any suggestion?

Source Link
Li Yutong
  • 3.5k
  • 16
  • 34

Finiteness of Gorenstein indexes and volumes for varieties in a bounded family

We say that a set of varieties $S$ lives in a bounded family if there exists a projective morphism $\mathcal{X} \to T$ between varieties of finite type, such that for any $X \in S$, there exists a closed point $t \in T$, such that its fibre $\mathcal{X}_t$ is isomorphic to $X$.

It seems that the following two facts related to bounded families used quite often without proof in the literature of birational geometry:

(1) If $S$ is a bounded family of $\mathbb{Q}$-Gorenstein varieties, then there exists a universal $m$, such that for any $X \in S$, $mK_X$ is a Cartier divisor, i.e. the Gorenstein index is bounded.

(2) Granted (1) is true, then the volume (suppose $n=\dim X$) $${\rm vol}(mK_X): = \lim_{k \to +\infty}\frac{n! h^0(X, kmK_X)}{k^n}$$ is bounded for any $X \in S$.

If I know the universal family $\mathcal{X}$ is $\mathbb Q$-Gorenstein, then the above two results follows easily. But I don't know if we can assume this because such universal families typically come from Hilbert schemes (I don't know if Hilbert schemes are $\mathbb Q$-Gorenstein or not). The closest result related (1) which I can find is Theorem B.1 in the paper Log canonical thresholds on varieties with bounded singularities. But it requires more than what I have: the fibres are required to be normal and the general fibre to have rational singularities.

However, I do think one needs something extra which natural comes from the construction of bounded family in order to make (1) and (2) holds. Any suggestion?