Timeline for "Classical" description of automorphic forms on unitary groups
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2016 at 15:03 | vote | accept | Eins Null | ||
| Nov 8, 2016 at 11:15 | history | edited | Myshkin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor formatting
|
| Nov 8, 2016 at 7:29 | answer | added | David Loeffler | timeline score: 11 | |
| Nov 8, 2016 at 0:15 | comment | added | Peter Humphries | I have no idea if such a thing exists in the literature, but one way to go about it would be to start with the adèlic picture of automorphic representations of unitary groups and work backwards. For $\mathrm{GL}_2$, this isn't too hard to do once the dictionary between classical automorphic forms on the upper half plane and automorphic representations of $\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ is fleshed out (and this exists in the literature, more or less, in the books of Gelbart, Bump, and Goldfeld-Hundley). | |
| Nov 8, 2016 at 0:08 | comment | added | reuns | By their L-functions ? | |
| Nov 7, 2016 at 23:08 | history | asked | Eins Null | CC BY-SA 3.0 |