Timeline for How to show that something is not completely metrizable
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2016 at 15:06 | comment | added | Tom | I know that my set has full cardinality and I would be very surprised if it was not Borel, but to be honest, I don't know that yet... | |
| Nov 17, 2016 at 15:04 | vote | accept | Tom | ||
| Nov 7, 2016 at 13:25 | answer | added | Carl Mummert | timeline score: 9 | |
| Nov 7, 2016 at 13:11 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | Is $A$ at least Borel? If you think it might not be Borel, then there is a whole different set of possible techniques to show that (non-measurable, has the wrong cardinality, etc). | |
| Nov 7, 2016 at 12:38 | answer | added | Spirit of Sierpinski | timeline score: 9 | |
| Nov 7, 2016 at 11:16 | history | asked | Tom | CC BY-SA 3.0 |