Timeline for integral of a "sin-omial" coefficients=binomial
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Dec 31, 2016 at 2:03 | history | edited | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Nov 5, 2016 at 14:24 | history | edited | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 75 characters in body
|
| Nov 5, 2016 at 13:15 | history | edited | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 23 characters in body
|
| Nov 5, 2016 at 2:26 | history | edited | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 97 characters in body
|
| Nov 5, 2016 at 2:15 | comment | added | Alex Selby | You can do that, but you haven't explained (or I haven't understood) why $2n$ times the integral along the arc is equal to the integral around the circle (deformed or otherwise). | |
| Nov 5, 2016 at 2:04 | comment | added | T. Amdeberhan | True. But, you may avoid singularities by small half-circles "bumps." | |
| Nov 5, 2016 at 2:00 | comment | added | Alex Selby | $F_{n,k}(z)$ doesn't have the symmetry you need to extend the integral from the arc to the full unit circle. (In fact, it has singularities on the unit circle.) | |
| Nov 5, 2016 at 1:39 | history | edited | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 182 characters in body
|
| Nov 5, 2016 at 1:08 | comment | added | Suvrit | This looks like the direction that motivated this: mathoverflow.net/questions/253835/… | |
| Nov 5, 2016 at 0:48 | history | answered | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |