Skip to main content

Timeline for On stochastic integration

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 19 at 10:02 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jul 22 at 9:09 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Mar 24 at 9:00 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Feb 23 at 7:33 history edited YCor CC BY-SA 4.0
removed capitals from title
Feb 23 at 5:51 answer added Thomas Kojar timeline score: 0
Nov 6, 2016 at 22:14 comment added ithusiasm I know, what you have written, but this does not answer my question.
Nov 3, 2016 at 23:48 comment added Liviu Nicolaescu The problem appears when you want to integrate (against) discontinuous semimartingales, e.g. $X$ is a discrete time martingale. If $X$ is a continuous (local) semimartingale than $\int_0^t H(s) dX(s)$ makes sense for progressive processes. Also, replacing $t_i$ by $T_i$ is not that important, but it yields to faster proofs. Have a look at LeGall's recent book Brownian Motion, Martingales and Stochastic Integrals.
Nov 3, 2016 at 17:25 comment added ithusiasm Right, but in Jacod/Shiryaev they argue that one needs predictibility in order to extend the stochastic integral beyond simple processes. They do not write: "predictibility is necessary in order to extend and stay in the (local) martingale world".
Nov 3, 2016 at 16:44 comment added Liviu Nicolaescu For the integral $\int_0^t H(s) dB(s)$ to be a martingale, $H$ has to be predictable. Also, you may want to open vol.2 of the book Diffusions, Markov Processes and Martingales by Rogers and Williams.
Nov 3, 2016 at 16:05 history asked ithusiasm CC BY-SA 3.0