Timeline for Some non-trivial Baer *-rings
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2016 at 11:04 | vote | accept | ABB | ||
| Nov 15, 2016 at 11:04 | |||||
| Nov 6, 2016 at 6:33 | vote | accept | ABB | ||
| Nov 14, 2016 at 15:13 | |||||
| Nov 6, 2016 at 6:31 | vote | accept | ABB | ||
| Nov 6, 2016 at 6:33 | |||||
| Nov 4, 2016 at 7:15 | comment | added | ABB | Nice. I send my results to your email soon. I will be very happy you take a look at. | |
| Nov 4, 2016 at 6:39 | comment | added | Bert Lindenhovius | I expanded my post. The C*-algebras that are Baer -algebras are called AW-algebras. You can find more information about these algebras in the book by Berberian on Baer *-rings. | |
| Nov 4, 2016 at 6:35 | history | edited | Bert Lindenhovius | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
AW*-algebras added
|
| Nov 4, 2016 at 6:26 | comment | added | ABB | Any way, all structure that I need to are: *-ring+complete lattice projection. | |
| Nov 4, 2016 at 6:25 | comment | added | ABB | I checked the definition of Baer *-ring. You are completely right. | |
| Nov 4, 2016 at 6:22 | comment | added | ABB | Thanks again. Actually I have found that the proof of some canonical theorems in vn-algebras is completely based on the algebraic+order structure of the vn-algebra. I mean the norm or w*-topology may never use. I am a new comer in Baer *-ring theory. It seems that this structure is really suitable to extend on, some well-known and canonical in vn-algebras. | |
| Nov 4, 2016 at 6:19 | vote | accept | ABB | ||
| Nov 5, 2016 at 6:21 | |||||
| Nov 3, 2016 at 8:28 | history | answered | Bert Lindenhovius | CC BY-SA 3.0 |