Timeline for Explicit example of second Borel–Cantelli lemma
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
2 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2016 at 18:32 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | It is not so awkward. Say, consider the minimal $k$ for which not all the digits from $(8k+1)$-st to $(8k+8)$-th are zeroes. The probability that the dyadic number formed by these 8 digits is divisible by 17 equals $1/17$. | |
| Oct 31, 2016 at 16:23 | history | answered | user83457 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |