Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 22, 2020 at 19:43 vote accept HeinrichD
Oct 30, 2016 at 20:46 comment added HeinrichD @KeithKearnes: This sounds good, especially because it is an adjective in contrast to ACC or maximal condition.
Oct 30, 2016 at 20:45 comment added HeinrichD @YCor: Thank you. But "ascending chain condition" (ACC) seems to be more standard and refers to arbitrary partial orders.
Oct 30, 2016 at 20:38 comment added YCor Probably there's no need for new terminology. For instance, Philip Hall (Finiteness conditions for soluble groups, 1954) refers to "the maximal condition for right ideals" (in a ring), "the maximal condition for subgroups" "the maximal condition for normal subgroups", etc. "The maximal condition for subalgebras" can also be found in old papers, e.g. this one: archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/CM/CM_1975__31_1/CM_1975__31_1_31_0/…
Oct 30, 2016 at 20:13 history edited Keith Kearnes CC BY-SA 3.0
added 6 characters in body
Oct 30, 2016 at 20:11 comment added Keith Kearnes I found a paper: Hereditarily Finitely Generated Commutative Monoids by J. C. Rosales and J. I. Garcı́a-Garcı́a, Journal of Algebra 221, 723-732 (1999). They use "hereditarily finitely generated" to mean a monoid whose submonoids are all finitely generated. This term might work for you.
Oct 30, 2016 at 20:00 history edited Keith Kearnes CC BY-SA 3.0
added 21 characters in body
Oct 30, 2016 at 19:44 comment added HeinrichD Thank you. This answers the terminology question. I would call this then "super finitely generated", since my question is not primarily about the property of being Noetherian. Notice that (i) -> (ii) needs that $k$ is Noetherian, but in their paper $k$ is just an alg. closed field.
Oct 30, 2016 at 19:30 history edited Keith Kearnes CC BY-SA 3.0
added 22 characters in body
Oct 30, 2016 at 19:12 history answered Keith Kearnes CC BY-SA 3.0