Timeline for Two equivalent statements about primes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Oct 30, 2016 at 18:11 | history | edited | GH from MO | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 266 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2016 at 9:29 | comment | added | GH from MO | @GerryMyerson: I agree. With current technology, it is not clear how to deduce (b) from (a). | |
| Oct 29, 2016 at 6:52 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | I take it that it follows that the two statements are not, in fact, equivalent (other than in the purely logical sense in which any two true statements are equivalent). | |
| Oct 29, 2016 at 3:53 | history | edited | GH from MO | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 526 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2016 at 3:47 | history | edited | GH from MO | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 526 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2016 at 3:38 | history | edited | GH from MO | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 98 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2016 at 3:19 | history | edited | GH from MO | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Oct 29, 2016 at 3:13 | history | edited | GH from MO | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Oct 29, 2016 at 3:07 | history | edited | GH from MO | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 38 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2016 at 3:02 | history | answered | GH from MO | CC BY-SA 3.0 |