Timeline for Clique numbers of chordal graphs
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2016 at 4:09 | vote | accept | gondolier | ||
| Nov 3, 2016 at 4:09 | vote | accept | gondolier | ||
| Nov 3, 2016 at 4:09 | |||||
| Nov 3, 2016 at 4:08 | vote | accept | gondolier | ||
| Nov 3, 2016 at 4:09 | |||||
| Oct 30, 2016 at 3:47 | vote | accept | gondolier | ||
| Oct 30, 2016 at 3:47 | |||||
| Oct 28, 2016 at 21:30 | answer | added | Richard Stanley | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 28, 2016 at 21:17 | answer | added | Fedor Petrov | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 28, 2016 at 20:58 | history | edited | gondolier | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 35 characters in body
|
| Oct 28, 2016 at 20:57 | comment | added | gondolier | Yes, in general that would be c_0. I have added the connectedness assumption. Thank you. | |
| Oct 28, 2016 at 20:57 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | Should we assume that $G$ is connected, or, the same thing, replace RHS to the number of connected components? | |
| Oct 28, 2016 at 20:13 | history | asked | gondolier | CC BY-SA 3.0 |