Skip to main content
References were added, more details were given
Source Link
paul Monsky
  • 5.4k
  • 2
  • 26
  • 45

Working on this topic for some time,I've come to understand the level 3 and 5 analogues to the characteristic 2 level 1 theory of modular forms developed by Nicolas and Serre. My first results arewere presented in three arXiv articles: Variations on a Lemma of Nicolas and Serre (1604.02622 [math.NT]), A Hecke algebra attached to mod 2 modular forms of level 3 (1508.07523 [math. NT]NT]), A Hecke algebra attached to mod 2 modular forms of level 5 (1610.07058 [math NT].NT]). Along the way I givegave a simplification simplification of the level 1 theory. EDIT--More precise results relating the earlier findings to structure results for more naturally appearing Hecke algebras are found in three further arXiv postings; 1603.03910, 1612.01599 and 1703.04193. I'll start with a description of the earlier results.

In each of levels 1,3,5 one has a subspace of Z/2[[x]] having as basis certain D_k. In level 1 (resp. 3,5), k runs over the positive integers prime to 2 (resp. 6,10). The formal Hecke operators T_p, p odd and not equal to the level stabilize our space; in fact T_p (D_k) is a sum of D_j with j < k. Furthermore the completed (weakshallow) Hecke algebra attached to the space is a power series ring Z/2[[X,Y]] in level 1, while in levels 3 and 5 one needs to adjoin an element of square zero to this power series ring. (X and Y may be taken to be T_3 and T_5 for the first space, T_7 and T_13 for the second space, T_3 and T_7 for the third space).

EDIT---I'llI'll explain finally hownext the connection of the three spaces described above,spanned by various D_k, are related to with modular forms of level Gamma_0 (N) where N is 1,3, and 5. Let M(odd,N) consist of those "odd" elements of Z/2[[x]] that are the mod 2 reductions of expansions at infinity lying in Z[[x]] of holomorphic modular forms of level Gamma_0 (N).(Any weight is allowed).

1.---The first space, that spanned by the D_k with (k,2)=1, is M(odd,1).

EDIT:

2.---Let W1 be the subspace of theThe second space spanned byand third spaces are subquotients of M(odd,3) and M(odd,5). Namely there is a Hecke-stable filtration M(odd,3)> N2 > N1 > (0) with the D_kmiddle quotient N2/N1 identifying with k=1 mod 6the second of our spaces. The T_p(The two outer quotients identify with p=1 mod 6 stabilize W1M(odd,1)). Let K beAn identical result holds for M(odd,5) and the subspacelast of our spaces.

3.---Using the filtration of M(odd,3) annihilated bytogether with my results about the Hecke operator 1+U_3. Thenalgebra attached to the T_p with second space, and the Nicolas-Serre results about M(podd,61)=1 stabilize K and we get a, one gets the precise structure of the shallow Hecke algebra attached to KM(odd,3). ThereNamely it is an identificationthe quotient of W1 with KZ/2[[t_5, taking D to F+Gt_7, and preservingt_11, t_13]] (with t_p acting by T_p) by an ideal (A^2, AC, BC) where the actionleading forms of the T_p with p=1 mod 6. It follows from 1508.07523[NT] that K admits a basis adapted to T_7A, B and T_13 with m_0C are t_5 + t_7 + t_13,0 = F+G t_11 and t_7. There is an entirely similar result for M(odd,5).

4.---For the results of 3. see: Generators and thatrelations for the shallow mod 2 Hecke algebra attached to K is a power series ring in T_7levels Gamma_0 (3) and T_13Gamma_0 (5), (1703.04193 math.[NT]). These results have also been obtained by Shaunak Deo and Anna Medvedovsky using techniques from deformation theory.

35.---Let W_aK be the subspace of the third space spanned by the D_k with k=1M(odd,3,7,9 mod 20) consisting of f fixed by U_3. ThenThen the T_p with p=1,3,7,9 mod 20 stabilize W_ashallow Hecke algebra attached to K is just the reduced shallow Hecke algebra attached to our second space. Now letSo it is a power series ring in T_7 and T_13, Similarly if K beis the subspace of M(odd,5) annihilatedconsisting of f fixed by 1+U_5. We again have aU_5, then the shallow Hecke algebra attached to K. There is an identification of W_a with K taking D to F+G and preserving the action of the T_p with p=1,3,7,9 mod 20. It follows from 1610.07058[NT] that K admits a basis adapted to T_3 and T_7 and that thereduced shallow Hecke algebra attached to Kour third space, and is a power series ring in T_3 and T_7.

Working on this topic for some time,I've come to understand the level 3 and 5 analogues to the characteristic 2 level 1 theory of modular forms developed by Nicolas and Serre. My results are presented in three arXiv articles: Variations on a Lemma of Nicolas and Serre (1604.02622 [math.NT]), A Hecke algebra attached to mod 2 modular forms of level 3 (1508.07523 [math. NT]), A Hecke algebra attached to mod 2 modular forms of level 5 (1610.07058 [math NT]). Along the way I give a simplification of the level 1 theory.

In each of levels 1,3,5 one has a subspace of Z/2[[x]] having as basis certain D_k. In level 1 (resp. 3,5), k runs over the positive integers prime to 2 (resp. 6,10). The formal Hecke operators T_p, p odd and not equal to the level stabilize our space; in fact T_p (D_k) is a sum of D_j with j < k. Furthermore the completed (weak) Hecke algebra attached to the space is a power series ring Z/2[[X,Y]] in level 1, while in levels 3 and 5 one needs to adjoin an element of square zero to this power series ring.

EDIT---I'll explain finally how the three spaces described above,spanned by various D_k, are related to modular forms of level Gamma_0 (N) where N is 1,3, and 5. Let M(odd,N) consist of those "odd" elements of Z/2[[x]] that are the mod 2 reductions of expansions at infinity lying in Z[[x]] of holomorphic modular forms of level Gamma_0 (N).(Any weight is allowed).

1.---The first space, that spanned by the D_k with (k,2)=1, is M(odd,1).

2.---Let W1 be the subspace of the second space spanned by the D_k with k=1 mod 6. The T_p with p=1 mod 6 stabilize W1. Let K be the subspace of M(odd,3) annihilated by the Hecke operator 1+U_3. Then the T_p with (p,6)=1 stabilize K and we get a shallow Hecke algebra attached to K. There is an identification of W1 with K, taking D to F+G, and preserving the action of the T_p with p=1 mod 6. It follows from 1508.07523[NT] that K admits a basis adapted to T_7 and T_13 with m_0,0 = F+G, and that the shallow Hecke algebra attached to K is a power series ring in T_7 and T_13.

3.---Let W_a be the subspace of the third space spanned by the D_k with k=1,3,7,9 mod 20. Then the T_p with p=1,3,7,9 mod 20 stabilize W_a. Now let K be the subspace of M(odd,5) annihilated by 1+U_5. We again have a shallow Hecke algebra attached to K. There is an identification of W_a with K taking D to F+G and preserving the action of the T_p with p=1,3,7,9 mod 20. It follows from 1610.07058[NT] that K admits a basis adapted to T_3 and T_7 and that the shallow Hecke algebra attached to K is a power series ring in T_3 and T_7.

Working on this topic for some time,I've come to understand the level 3 and 5 analogues to the characteristic 2 level 1 theory of modular forms developed by Nicolas and Serre. My first results were presented in three arXiv articles: Variations on a Lemma of Nicolas and Serre (1604.02622 [math.NT]), A Hecke algebra attached to mod 2 modular forms of level 3 (1508.07523 [math.NT]), A Hecke algebra attached to mod 2 modular forms of level 5 (1610.07058 [math.NT]). Along the way I gave a simplification of the level 1 theory. EDIT--More precise results relating the earlier findings to structure results for more naturally appearing Hecke algebras are found in three further arXiv postings; 1603.03910, 1612.01599 and 1703.04193. I'll start with a description of the earlier results.

In each of levels 1,3,5 one has a subspace of Z/2[[x]] having as basis certain D_k. In level 1 (resp. 3,5), k runs over the positive integers prime to 2 (resp. 6,10). The formal Hecke operators T_p, p odd and not equal to the level stabilize our space; in fact T_p (D_k) is a sum of D_j with j < k. Furthermore the completed (shallow) Hecke algebra attached to the space is a power series ring Z/2[[X,Y]] in level 1, while in levels 3 and 5 one needs to adjoin an element of square zero to this power series ring. (X and Y may be taken to be T_3 and T_5 for the first space, T_7 and T_13 for the second space, T_3 and T_7 for the third space).

I'll explain next the connection of the three spaces described above with modular forms of level Gamma_0 (N) where N is 1,3, and 5. Let M(odd,N) consist of those "odd" elements of Z/2[[x]] that are the mod 2 reductions of expansions at infinity lying in Z[[x]] of holomorphic modular forms of level Gamma_0 (N).(Any weight is allowed).

1.---The first space, that spanned by the D_k with (k,2)=1, is M(odd,1).

EDIT:

2.---The second and third spaces are subquotients of M(odd,3) and M(odd,5). Namely there is a Hecke-stable filtration M(odd,3)> N2 > N1 > (0) with the middle quotient N2/N1 identifying with the second of our spaces. (The two outer quotients identify with M(odd,1)). An identical result holds for M(odd,5) and the last of our spaces.

3.---Using the filtration of M(odd,3) together with my results about the Hecke algebra attached to the second space, and the Nicolas-Serre results about M(odd,1), one gets the precise structure of the shallow Hecke algebra attached to M(odd,3). Namely it is the quotient of Z/2[[t_5, t_7, t_11, t_13]] (with t_p acting by T_p) by an ideal (A^2, AC, BC) where the leading forms of A, B and C are t_5 + t_7 + t_13, t_11 and t_7. There is an entirely similar result for M(odd,5).

4.---For the results of 3. see: Generators and relations for the shallow mod 2 Hecke algebra in levels Gamma_0 (3) and Gamma_0 (5), (1703.04193 math.[NT]). These results have also been obtained by Shaunak Deo and Anna Medvedovsky using techniques from deformation theory.

5.---Let K be the subspace of M(odd,3) consisting of f fixed by U_3.Then the shallow Hecke algebra attached to K is just the reduced shallow Hecke algebra attached to our second space. So it is a power series ring in T_7 and T_13, Similarly if K is the subspace of M(odd,5) consisting of f fixed by U_5, then the shallow Hecke algebra attached to K is the reduced shallow Hecke algebra attached to our third space, and is a power series ring in T_3 and T_7.

Connections with modular forms moire fully explained. Typo corrected.
Source Link
paul Monsky
  • 5.4k
  • 2
  • 26
  • 45

Here's the definition of the various spaces. Let F be x+x^9+x^25+x^49+.... In level 1, D_k is F^k. In level 3, let G(x) be F(x^3) and D(x) be F(x)+F(x^9). Then D_1 = D , D_5 = (D^2)G and D_(k+6) = (G^2)D_k. In level 5 let G(x) be F(x^5) and D(x) be F(x)+F(x^25). Then D_1 = D, D_3 = (D^8)/G, D_7 = (D^2)G, D^9D_9 = (D^4)G and D_(k+10) = (G^2)D_k.

EDIT---I'll explain finally how the three spaces described above,spanned by various D_k, are related to modular forms of level Gamma_0 (N) where N is 1,3, and 5. Let M(odd,N) consist of those "odd" elements of Z/2[[x]] that are the mod 2 reductions of expansions at infinity lying in Z[[x]] of holomorphic modular forms of level Gamma_0 (N).(Any weight is allowed).

1.---The first space, that spanned by the D_k with (k,2)=1, is M(odd,1).

2.---Let W1 be the subspace of the second space spanned by the D_k with k=1 mod 6. The T_p with p=1 mod 6 stabilize W1. Let K be the subspace of M(odd,3) annihilated by the Hecke operator 1+U_3. Then the T_p with (p,6)=1 stabilize K and we get a shallow Hecke algebra attached to K. There is an identification of W1 with K, taking D to F+G, and preserving the action of the T_p with p=1 mod 6. It follows from 1508.07523[NT] that K admits a basis adapted to T_7 and T_13 with m_0,0 = F+G, and that the shallow Hecke algebra attached to K is a power series ring in T_7 and T_13.

3.---Let W_a be the subspace of the third space spanned by the D_k with k=1,3,7,9 mod 20. Then the T_p with p=1,3,7,9 mod 20 stabilize W_a. Now let K be the subspace of M(odd,5) annihilated by 1+U_5. We again have a shallow Hecke algebra attached to K. There is an identification of W_a with K taking D to F+G and preserving the action of the T_p with p=1,3,7,9 mod 20. It follows from 1610.07058[NT] that K admits a basis adapted to T_3 and T_7 and that the shallow Hecke algebra attached to K is a power series ring in T_3 and T_7.

Here's the definition of the various spaces. Let F be x+x^9+x^25+x^49+.... In level 1, D_k is F^k. In level 3, let G(x) be F(x^3) and D(x) be F(x)+F(x^9). Then D_1 = D , D_5 = (D^2)G and D_(k+6) = (G^2)D_k. In level 5 let G(x) be F(x^5) and D(x) be F(x)+F(x^25). Then D_1 = D, D_3 = (D^8)/G, D_7 = (D^2)G, D^9 = (D^4)G and D_(k+10) = (G^2)D_k.

Here's the definition of the various spaces. Let F be x+x^9+x^25+x^49+.... In level 1, D_k is F^k. In level 3, let G(x) be F(x^3) and D(x) be F(x)+F(x^9). Then D_1 = D , D_5 = (D^2)G and D_(k+6) = (G^2)D_k. In level 5 let G(x) be F(x^5) and D(x) be F(x)+F(x^25). Then D_1 = D, D_3 = (D^8)/G, D_7 = (D^2)G, D_9 = (D^4)G and D_(k+10) = (G^2)D_k.

EDIT---I'll explain finally how the three spaces described above,spanned by various D_k, are related to modular forms of level Gamma_0 (N) where N is 1,3, and 5. Let M(odd,N) consist of those "odd" elements of Z/2[[x]] that are the mod 2 reductions of expansions at infinity lying in Z[[x]] of holomorphic modular forms of level Gamma_0 (N).(Any weight is allowed).

1.---The first space, that spanned by the D_k with (k,2)=1, is M(odd,1).

2.---Let W1 be the subspace of the second space spanned by the D_k with k=1 mod 6. The T_p with p=1 mod 6 stabilize W1. Let K be the subspace of M(odd,3) annihilated by the Hecke operator 1+U_3. Then the T_p with (p,6)=1 stabilize K and we get a shallow Hecke algebra attached to K. There is an identification of W1 with K, taking D to F+G, and preserving the action of the T_p with p=1 mod 6. It follows from 1508.07523[NT] that K admits a basis adapted to T_7 and T_13 with m_0,0 = F+G, and that the shallow Hecke algebra attached to K is a power series ring in T_7 and T_13.

3.---Let W_a be the subspace of the third space spanned by the D_k with k=1,3,7,9 mod 20. Then the T_p with p=1,3,7,9 mod 20 stabilize W_a. Now let K be the subspace of M(odd,5) annihilated by 1+U_5. We again have a shallow Hecke algebra attached to K. There is an identification of W_a with K taking D to F+G and preserving the action of the T_p with p=1,3,7,9 mod 20. It follows from 1610.07058[NT] that K admits a basis adapted to T_3 and T_7 and that the shallow Hecke algebra attached to K is a power series ring in T_3 and T_7.

Source Link
paul Monsky
  • 5.4k
  • 2
  • 26
  • 45

Working on this topic for some time,I've come to understand the level 3 and 5 analogues to the characteristic 2 level 1 theory of modular forms developed by Nicolas and Serre. My results are presented in three arXiv articles: Variations on a Lemma of Nicolas and Serre (1604.02622 [math.NT]), A Hecke algebra attached to mod 2 modular forms of level 3 (1508.07523 [math. NT]), A Hecke algebra attached to mod 2 modular forms of level 5 (1610.07058 [math NT]). Along the way I give a simplification of the level 1 theory.

In each of levels 1,3,5 one has a subspace of Z/2[[x]] having as basis certain D_k. In level 1 (resp. 3,5), k runs over the positive integers prime to 2 (resp. 6,10). The formal Hecke operators T_p, p odd and not equal to the level stabilize our space; in fact T_p (D_k) is a sum of D_j with j < k. Furthermore the completed (weak) Hecke algebra attached to the space is a power series ring Z/2[[X,Y]] in level 1, while in levels 3 and 5 one needs to adjoin an element of square zero to this power series ring.

Here's the definition of the various spaces. Let F be x+x^9+x^25+x^49+.... In level 1, D_k is F^k. In level 3, let G(x) be F(x^3) and D(x) be F(x)+F(x^9). Then D_1 = D , D_5 = (D^2)G and D_(k+6) = (G^2)D_k. In level 5 let G(x) be F(x^5) and D(x) be F(x)+F(x^25). Then D_1 = D, D_3 = (D^8)/G, D_7 = (D^2)G, D^9 = (D^4)G and D_(k+10) = (G^2)D_k.

The main tools in the proofs are :

  1. Analogues of the Nicolas-Serre "code" and the related "Proposition 4.3". The arguments here have, at their root, ideas of Mathilde Gerbelli-Gauthier.

  2. Ideal theory in Z[i] in levels 1 and 3, and in Z[root -10] in level 5. This is used to study the action of Hecke operators on certain spaces of theta series attached to binary quadratic forms, and allows one to get around the difficult "Proposition 4.4" of Nicolas and Serre.