Skip to main content
Rollback to Revision 1
Source Link
Ricardo Andrade
  • 6.2k
  • 5
  • 42
  • 69

Properties of the $n$n-dimensional Stereographic Projection

Hello,

I'm looking for an argument that the $n$n-dimensional stereographic projection maps circles (intersections of affine two-dimensional subspaces with $\mathbb S^n$S^n) to circles in $\mathbb R^n$R^n. I've looked around and the only argument I saw for the n-dimensional case is a generalization of the geometric proof for $n = 2$n = 2 (with the tangent cone) which I don't really feel comfortable with, even when $n = 2$n = 2. Is it possible to reduce it to the $n = 2$n = 2 case somehow or give a "direct", algebraic, proof?

Properties of the $n$-dimensional Stereographic Projection

I'm looking for an argument that the $n$-dimensional stereographic projection maps circles (intersections of affine two-dimensional subspaces with $\mathbb S^n$) to circles in $\mathbb R^n$. I've looked around and the only argument I saw for the n-dimensional case is a generalization of the geometric proof for $n = 2$ (with the tangent cone) which I don't really feel comfortable with, even when $n = 2$. Is it possible to reduce it to the $n = 2$ case somehow or give a "direct", algebraic, proof?

Properties of the n-dimensional Stereographic Projection

Hello,

I'm looking for an argument that the n-dimensional stereographic projection maps circles (intersections of affine two-dimensional subspaces with S^n) to circles in R^n. I've looked around and the only argument I saw for the n-dimensional case is a generalization of the geometric proof for n = 2 (with the tangent cone) which I don't really feel comfortable with, even when n = 2. Is it possible to reduce it to the n = 2 case somehow or give a "direct", algebraic, proof?

minor TeX improvements
Source Link
agt
  • 4.3k
  • 2
  • 36
  • 51

Properties of the n$n$-dimensional Stereographic Projection

Hello,

I'm looking for an argument that the n$n$-dimensional stereographic projection maps circles (intersections of affine two-dimensional subspaces with $S^n$$\mathbb S^n$) to circles in $R^n$$\mathbb R^n$. I've looked around and the only argument I saw for the n-dimensional case is a generalization of the geometric proof for $n = 2$ (with the tangent cone) which I don't really feel comfortable with, even when $n = 2$. Is it possible to reduce it to the $n = 2$ case somehow or give a "direct", algebraic, proof?

Properties of the n-dimensional Stereographic Projection

Hello,

I'm looking for an argument that the n-dimensional stereographic projection maps circles (intersections of affine two-dimensional subspaces with $S^n$) to circles in $R^n$. I've looked around and the only argument I saw for the n-dimensional case is a generalization of the geometric proof for $n = 2$ (with the tangent cone) which I don't really feel comfortable with, even when $n = 2$. Is it possible to reduce it to the $n = 2$ case somehow or give a "direct", algebraic, proof?

Properties of the $n$-dimensional Stereographic Projection

I'm looking for an argument that the $n$-dimensional stereographic projection maps circles (intersections of affine two-dimensional subspaces with $\mathbb S^n$) to circles in $\mathbb R^n$. I've looked around and the only argument I saw for the n-dimensional case is a generalization of the geometric proof for $n = 2$ (with the tangent cone) which I don't really feel comfortable with, even when $n = 2$. Is it possible to reduce it to the $n = 2$ case somehow or give a "direct", algebraic, proof?

Hello,

I'm looking for an argument that the n-dimensional stereographic projection maps circles (intersections of affine two-dimensional subspaces with S^n$S^n$) to circles in R^n$R^n$. I've looked around and the only argument I saw for the n-dimensional case is a generalization of the geometric proof for n = 2$n = 2$ (with the tangent cone) which I don't really feel comfortable with, even when n = 2$n = 2$. Is it possible to reduce it to the n = 2$n = 2$ case somehow or give a "direct", algebraic, proof?

Hello,

I'm looking for an argument that the n-dimensional stereographic projection maps circles (intersections of affine two-dimensional subspaces with S^n) to circles in R^n. I've looked around and the only argument I saw for the n-dimensional case is a generalization of the geometric proof for n = 2 (with the tangent cone) which I don't really feel comfortable with, even when n = 2. Is it possible to reduce it to the n = 2 case somehow or give a "direct", algebraic, proof?

Hello,

I'm looking for an argument that the n-dimensional stereographic projection maps circles (intersections of affine two-dimensional subspaces with $S^n$) to circles in $R^n$. I've looked around and the only argument I saw for the n-dimensional case is a generalization of the geometric proof for $n = 2$ (with the tangent cone) which I don't really feel comfortable with, even when $n = 2$. Is it possible to reduce it to the $n = 2$ case somehow or give a "direct", algebraic, proof?

Source Link
Blop
  • 51
  • 2
Loading