Timeline for Is the Gromov conjecture still open?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2016 at 11:04 | comment | added | T. Amdeberhan | Ah, yes: I did overlook "simply-connected" in the OP's question. In fact, page 14, 2nd paragraph, lines 4-5, admits lack of knowledge of such manifolds. Yet, this is a marvelous paper with all sorts of examples for other cases. | |
| Oct 13, 2016 at 1:37 | history | edited | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
important correction made.
|
| Oct 12, 2016 at 22:48 | comment | added | Igor Belegradek | I think you overlooked the assumption that the manifold is simply-connected. None of the examples I see on pp 7-10 are simply-connected. Maybe I a missing something. If so, please give a page/line reference. | |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 21:02 | vote | accept | C.F.G | ||
| Oct 13, 2016 at 8:09 | |||||
| Oct 12, 2016 at 21:00 | comment | added | Igor Belegradek | Can you give a more precise (page) reference in the Gromov's paper? Certainly, closed simply-connected manifolds have zero simplicial volume (see p.14 of the same paper). | |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 20:39 | history | answered | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |