Timeline for Is the Gromov conjecture still open?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
27 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2017 at 13:30 | history | edited | C.F.G |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 4, 2017 at 16:44 | history | edited | C.F.G | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 18 characters in body
|
| S Aug 9, 2017 at 6:02 | history | bounty ended | C.F.G | ||
| S Aug 9, 2017 at 6:02 | history | notice removed | C.F.G | ||
| Aug 7, 2017 at 6:26 | vote | accept | C.F.G | ||
| Aug 6, 2017 at 18:26 | answer | added | Misha | timeline score: 11 | |
| Aug 6, 2017 at 16:56 | comment | added | C.F.G | He just gave to me an idea and he does't know the reference or how to prove it. | |
| Aug 6, 2017 at 15:23 | comment | added | Deane Yang | I don't understand. Either your teacher knows the reference or how to prove it. In the latter case they should write a paper. If neither, then your teacher doesn't know and shouldn't claim to. | |
| S Aug 6, 2017 at 10:36 | history | bounty started | C.F.G | ||
| S Aug 6, 2017 at 10:36 | history | notice added | C.F.G | Improve details | |
| Aug 4, 2017 at 11:01 | comment | added | C.F.G | No. I asked him about sectional curvature restriction on Gromov definition that in Ricci flow not appear, but he told to me that there is various version of Ricci flow for various purposes such as normalized version. | |
| S Aug 4, 2017 at 10:09 | history | edited | Tony Pantev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I add a tag
|
| S Aug 4, 2017 at 10:09 | history | suggested | Ali Taghavi |
I add a tag
|
|
| Aug 4, 2017 at 9:47 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 4, 2017 at 10:09 | |||||
| Aug 4, 2017 at 8:26 | comment | added | HJRW | Perhaps the teacher just meant that the Poincare conjecture implies a positive answer in dimension 3? | |
| Aug 4, 2017 at 7:31 | comment | added | Misha | According to wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimal_volume, the conjecture is still open. I do not see at all how RF can help here. There is no positivity assumption on curvature(s) of $M$ in this conjecture and RF in higher dimensions is mostly a mystery without some positivity assumptions. I suggest you ask your teacher for a reference. | |
| Aug 4, 2017 at 4:54 | history | edited | C.F.G | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| S Aug 4, 2017 at 4:52 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I've added an update
|
| Aug 4, 2017 at 4:50 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 4, 2017 at 4:52 | |||||
| Oct 13, 2016 at 8:11 | comment | added | YCor | It means that the answer does not tell you about this, although giving interesting context. I don't know if it's still open (I would tend to guess so). | |
| Oct 13, 2016 at 8:09 | comment | added | C.F.G | It means that Gromov conjecture is open still? | |
| Oct 13, 2016 at 8:06 | comment | added | YCor | Because the conjecture is about simply connected manifolds. | |
| Oct 13, 2016 at 8:00 | comment | added | C.F.G | @YCor, Why this answer does not answer my question? | |
| Oct 13, 2016 at 3:26 | comment | added | YCor | I think you can upvote, but shouldn't accept an answer which does not answer your question. | |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 21:02 | vote | accept | C.F.G | ||
| Oct 13, 2016 at 8:09 | |||||
| Oct 12, 2016 at 20:39 | answer | added | T. Amdeberhan | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 20:08 | history | asked | C.F.G | CC BY-SA 3.0 |