Skip to main content
fixed arxiv front-end link
Source Link
David Roberts
  • 35.4k
  • 11
  • 124
  • 348

I'd say it's closer to an oriented manifold with corners (corners happening where the divisor is singular), or even that times a coefficient. In these papersthese papers Khesin, Rosly, and later Thomas build a homology theory based on this analogy.

I'd say it's closer to an oriented manifold with corners (corners happening where the divisor is singular), or even that times a coefficient. In these papers Khesin, Rosly, and later Thomas build a homology theory based on this analogy.

I'd say it's closer to an oriented manifold with corners (corners happening where the divisor is singular), or even that times a coefficient. In these papers Khesin, Rosly, and later Thomas build a homology theory based on this analogy.

Source Link
Allen Knutson
  • 27.8k
  • 4
  • 54
  • 152

I'd say it's closer to an oriented manifold with corners (corners happening where the divisor is singular), or even that times a coefficient. In these papers Khesin, Rosly, and later Thomas build a homology theory based on this analogy.