Timeline for Correspondence between $SBT (n)$ and $W(B_n)$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2016 at 7:05 | vote | accept | bing | ||
| Oct 11, 2016 at 7:05 | |||||
| Oct 11, 2016 at 6:57 | comment | added | bing | @Brian Hopkins Thank you very much. | |
| Oct 10, 2016 at 18:34 | comment | added | Brian Hopkins | Thanks for the updates, especially Thomas and Monty's realization of the long asserted but never seen fourth paper. My answer is based on my thesis work some twenty years ago, but I have not kept up with this field. | |
| Oct 10, 2016 at 18:27 | history | edited | Brian Hopkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Oct 10, 2016 at 17:36 | comment | added | darij grinberg | And here's the fourth: math.washington.edu/~mcgovern/G4-2016-1-31.pdf (see mathoverflow.net/questions/223168/… for history) | |
| Oct 10, 2016 at 17:35 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Second one's on EUDML too: eudml.org/doc/90142 | |
| Oct 10, 2016 at 17:26 | comment | added | Martin Rubey | if you want a pair of domino tableaux, I think the local rules given by Thomas Lam are excellent, see Thomas Lam. Growth diagrams, domino insertion and sign-imbalance. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A Volume 107, Number 1 (2004), pp. 87-115. Shameless plug: trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21594 | |
| Oct 10, 2016 at 13:16 | history | answered | Brian Hopkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |