Timeline for $F$-pure threshold of an $F$-pure ideal
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 7, 2016 at 15:45 | history | edited | Tom Church | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body
|
Oct 7, 2016 at 15:37 | comment | added | lemiller | This paper has the calculation for the $F$-pure threshold which can easily fail to be $1$. I'm sure there are much easier examples however. | |
Oct 7, 2016 at 15:32 | comment | added | Aurora | @lemiller, Thanks. Would you please mention its reference? The question can be modifies as, whether $F$-pure ideals have a particular $F$-pure threshold, something like a function of the dimension of the ring or the codimension of the defining ideal | |
Oct 7, 2016 at 15:29 | comment | added | lemiller | The question isn't worded particularly well. What is A? The $F$-pure threshold takes as input the data of a pair $(R, \mathfrak{a})$ so I assume you are using $(A, \mathfrak{a})$ when you write $fpt(\mathfrak{a})$. There are examples of regular local rings $A$ with $F$-pure quotient $A/\mathfrak{a}$ and yet the $F$-pure threshold of the pair $(A, \mathfrak{a}) \neq 1$; an easy one that comes to mind is taking $A$ to be a polynomial ring in $n^2$ variables and $\mathfrak{a}$ the ideal defined by minors of the matrix of variables. | |
S Oct 7, 2016 at 14:33 | history | suggested | C.F.G | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improve formatting
|
Oct 7, 2016 at 14:20 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Oct 7, 2016 at 14:33 | |||||
Oct 7, 2016 at 12:48 | history | asked | Aurora | CC BY-SA 3.0 |