Timeline for "Role" of cohomology of coherent sheaves in SGA 4.5, étale cohomology
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2016 at 21:59 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Oct 8, 2016 at 10:19 | comment | added | Matthieu Romagny | Dear ACL, sure, the comment is apt. | |
| Oct 7, 2016 at 22:02 | comment | added | ACL | Thanks @MatthieuRomagny. What I had in mind, as you probably understood, is that the first étale/Zariski cohomology group of $\mathbf G_m$ classifies étale/Zariski line bundles, and the latter are quasi-coherent sheaves. | |
| Oct 7, 2016 at 21:59 | history | edited | ACL | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 54 characters in body
|
| Oct 7, 2016 at 18:39 | comment | added | Matthieu Romagny | As it stands, the formulation is awkward since G_m-valued cohomology is presented as an instance of coherent cohomology. | |
| Oct 7, 2016 at 17:27 | history | edited | ACL | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removing an incorrect remark.
|
| Oct 7, 2016 at 7:41 | history | answered | ACL | CC BY-SA 3.0 |