Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 8, 2016 at 16:38 vote accept Al Tal
Oct 8, 2016 at 16:38
Oct 6, 2016 at 5:08 history edited Francesco Polizzi CC BY-SA 3.0
added 72 characters in body
Oct 6, 2016 at 5:06 comment added Francesco Polizzi @TannerSwett: oh, right. I meant that the decidability of the world problem does not imply the decidability of the order problem. Fixed, thanks.
Oct 5, 2016 at 23:50 comment added Sophie Swett @FrancescoPolizzi, don't you mean the answer is no (it is not decidable in general), rather than yes (it is decidable in general)?
Oct 5, 2016 at 18:29 comment added Al Tal Indeed, Collins uses a special notation. For him, the identity element $1_G$ is a $0$-th power of all elements, so $(x,1)$ all belong to the set of power pairs. Therefore, the power problem may indeed have Turing degree below the order problem.
Oct 5, 2016 at 18:11 comment added Benjamin Steinberg Maybe his version is not unidirectional
Oct 5, 2016 at 18:01 comment added Francesco Polizzi At the moment I have no access to the full paper. However, the abstract says: The chapter concludes by proving a lemma that shows that groups with a soluble power problem and an insoluble order problem have an unexpected algebraic property, so it seems that he is actually able to provide examples where the power problem has a lower Turing degree than the order problem.
Oct 5, 2016 at 17:51 comment added Benjamin Steinberg Unless Collins is using a different definition of the power problem than McCool I think the power problem should have a higher Turing degree than the order problem
Oct 5, 2016 at 17:27 history edited Francesco Polizzi CC BY-SA 3.0
added 117 characters in body
Oct 5, 2016 at 17:21 history answered Francesco Polizzi CC BY-SA 3.0