Timeline for Is there an intrinsic definition of fractal (i.e. not embedded in euclidean space)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2010 at 14:40 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | @Colin: I prefer to say not that the domain is fractal, but the boundary is. And that biholomorphism generally is not Lipschitz on the boundary. | |
| May 19, 2010 at 3:06 | comment | added | user2529 | for instance any simply connected proper domain of the plane (which could be a fractal) is biholomorphic to the open disc (which is not a fractal). but yet biholomorphism implies homeomorphism. | |
| May 19, 2010 at 3:01 | comment | added | user2529 | thanks edgar. and all these definitions of dimension are invariant under isometry/hemeomorphism? | |
| May 19, 2010 at 3:01 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| May 18, 2010 at 14:07 | history | answered | Gerald Edgar | CC BY-SA 2.5 |