Timeline for The Riemann correspondence for riemann surfaces made explicit and its generalizations
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| May 18, 2010 at 5:54 | comment | added | BCnrd | @Charles: The aspect of Ch. I which is painful is exactly the step of making the smooth curve model...because there Hartshorne introduces a rather wacky (to a beginner) notion of "abstract curve", and doesn't have tools at that point to discuss normalization in a meaningful way. Getting rid of the singularities is (I think) the most serious part of the leap from the function field back to the Riemann surface. It's also subtle in a purely analytic approach if one avoids the use of algebraic methods (and doesn't have available a theory of complex-analytic spaces...). | |
| May 18, 2010 at 5:40 | history | answered | Charles Siegel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |