Skip to main content
added 8 characters in body; edited title
Source Link

The problem I am working on is:

Given an $n$ dimensional vector $R \in \mathcal{R}^n$$r \in \mathcal{R}^n$, and a convex set $G=\{\mu \in \mathcal{R}^n | \mu_i \ge 0, ~ \mu^T \mathbf{1}=1, ~ A\mu =0 \}$ where $\mathbf{1}= [1, 1, ..., 1]^T$. ($A \in \mathcal{R}^{m \times n}$ and $m < n$) We assume that the set $G$ is not an empty set.

Suppose $\bar{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} R^T\mu$$\bar{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} r^T\mu$ given $R$$r$. Then can we say $\tilde{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} \bar{\mu}^T\mu$ is identical to $\bar{\mu}$?

I believe that this problem is closely related to the relationship between reinforcement learning and inverse reinforcement learning.

The problem I am working on is:

Given an $n$ dimensional vector $R \in \mathcal{R}^n$, and a convex set $G=\{\mu \in \mathcal{R}^n | \mu_i \ge 0, ~ \mu^T \mathbf{1}=1, ~ A\mu =0 \}$ where $\mathbf{1}= [1, 1, ..., 1]^T$. ($A \in \mathcal{R}^{m \times n}$ and $m < n$) We assume that the set $G$ is not an empty set.

Suppose $\bar{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} R^T\mu$ given $R$. Then can we say $\tilde{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} \bar{\mu}^T\mu$ is identical to $\bar{\mu}$?

I believe that this problem is closely related to the relationship between reinforcement learning and inverse reinforcement learning.

The problem I am working on is:

Given an $n$ dimensional vector $r \in \mathcal{R}^n$, and a convex set $G=\{\mu \in \mathcal{R}^n | \mu_i \ge 0, ~ \mu^T \mathbf{1}=1, ~ A\mu =0 \}$ where $\mathbf{1}= [1, 1, ..., 1]^T$. ($A \in \mathcal{R}^{m \times n}$ and $m < n$) We assume that the set $G$ is not an empty set.

Suppose $\bar{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} r^T\mu$ given $r$. Then can we say $\tilde{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} \bar{\mu}^T\mu$ is identical to $\bar{\mu}$?

added 8 characters in body; edited title
Source Link

Recursive linear programming on a linear subset of a simplex

The questionproblem I am working on is as following:

Given an $n$ dimensional vector $R \in \mathcal{R}^n$, and a convex set $G=\{\mu \in \mathcal{R}^n | \mu_i \ge 0, ~ \mu^T \mathbf{1}=1, ~ A\mu =0 \}$ where $\mathbf{1}= [1, 1, ..., 1]^T$. ($A \in \mathcal{R}^{m \times n}$ and $m < n$) We assume that the set $G$ is not an empty set.

Suppose $\bar{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} R^T\mu$ given $R$. Then can we say $\tilde{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} \bar{\mu}^T\mu$ is identical to $\bar{\mu}$?

I believe that this problemsproblem is closely related to the relationship between reinforcement learning and inverse reinforcement learning.

Recursive linear programming on linear subset of a simplex

The question I am working on is as following:

Given an $n$ dimensional vector $R \in \mathcal{R}^n$, and a convex set $G=\{\mu \in \mathcal{R}^n | \mu_i \ge 0, ~ \mu^T \mathbf{1}=1, ~ A\mu =0 \}$ where $\mathbf{1}= [1, 1, ..., 1]^T$. ($A \in \mathcal{R}^{m \times n}$ and $m < n$) We assume that the set $G$ is not an empty set.

Suppose $\bar{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} R^T\mu$ given $R$. Then can we say $\tilde{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} \bar{\mu}^T\mu$ is identical to $\bar{\mu}$?

I believe this problems is closely related to the relationship between reinforcement learning and inverse reinforcement learning.

Recursive linear programming on a linear subset of a simplex

The problem I am working on is:

Given an $n$ dimensional vector $R \in \mathcal{R}^n$, and a convex set $G=\{\mu \in \mathcal{R}^n | \mu_i \ge 0, ~ \mu^T \mathbf{1}=1, ~ A\mu =0 \}$ where $\mathbf{1}= [1, 1, ..., 1]^T$. ($A \in \mathcal{R}^{m \times n}$ and $m < n$) We assume that the set $G$ is not an empty set.

Suppose $\bar{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} R^T\mu$ given $R$. Then can we say $\tilde{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} \bar{\mu}^T\mu$ is identical to $\bar{\mu}$?

I believe that this problem is closely related to the relationship between reinforcement learning and inverse reinforcement learning.

deleted 3 characters in body
Source Link
Francesco Polizzi
  • 66.3k
  • 5
  • 180
  • 283

:) The The question I am working on is as followsfollowing:

Given an $n$ dimensional vector $R \in \mathcal{R}^n$, and a convex set $G=\{\mu \in \mathcal{R}^n | \mu_i \ge 0, ~ \mu^T \mathbf{1}=1, ~ A\mu =0 \}$ where $\mathbf{1}= [1, 1, ..., 1]^T$. ($A \in \mathcal{R}^{m \times n}$ and $m < n$) We assume that the set $G$ is not an empty set.

Suppose $\bar{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} R^T\mu$ given $R$. Then can we say $\tilde{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} \bar{\mu}^T\mu$ is identical to $\bar{\mu}$?

I believe this problems is closely related to the relationship between reinforcement learning and inverse reinforcement learning.

:) The question I am working on is as follows:

Given an $n$ dimensional vector $R \in \mathcal{R}^n$, and a convex set $G=\{\mu \in \mathcal{R}^n | \mu_i \ge 0, ~ \mu^T \mathbf{1}=1, ~ A\mu =0 \}$ where $\mathbf{1}= [1, 1, ..., 1]^T$. ($A \in \mathcal{R}^{m \times n}$ and $m < n$) We assume that the set $G$ is not an empty set.

Suppose $\bar{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} R^T\mu$ given $R$. Then can we say $\tilde{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} \bar{\mu}^T\mu$ is identical to $\bar{\mu}$?

I believe this problems is closely related to the relationship between reinforcement learning and inverse reinforcement learning.

The question I am working on is as following:

Given an $n$ dimensional vector $R \in \mathcal{R}^n$, and a convex set $G=\{\mu \in \mathcal{R}^n | \mu_i \ge 0, ~ \mu^T \mathbf{1}=1, ~ A\mu =0 \}$ where $\mathbf{1}= [1, 1, ..., 1]^T$. ($A \in \mathcal{R}^{m \times n}$ and $m < n$) We assume that the set $G$ is not an empty set.

Suppose $\bar{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} R^T\mu$ given $R$. Then can we say $\tilde{\mu} = \arg \max_{\mu \in G} \bar{\mu}^T\mu$ is identical to $\bar{\mu}$?

I believe this problems is closely related to the relationship between reinforcement learning and inverse reinforcement learning.

Source Link
Loading