Skip to main content

Timeline for on the Springer sheaf

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 18, 2016 at 1:08 comment added Geordie Williamson The sentence starting "We know that..." is false: small tells us that it is the IC extension of the local system on the regular semi-simple locus. This representation is the regular representation and is not irreducible. Also, the answer to "Is this sheaf..." is no: over the regular (not necessarily semi-simple) elements the dimension is constantly zero, however the number of points in the fibre can change, varying between order of Weyl group and 1, thus the sheaf is not locally constant over this locus.
Sep 17, 2016 at 20:07 comment added prochet the dimension is related to centralizer and ofr unipotent elements of $GL_{n}$, I think this dimension characterizes the conjugacy class, no?
Sep 17, 2016 at 19:51 comment added Sasha Why do you think so? The stalks of this sheaf should reflect the topology of the fibers which is more rich than just their dimension...
Sep 17, 2016 at 17:38 history edited prochet CC BY-SA 3.0
added 38 characters in body
Sep 17, 2016 at 17:31 comment added prochet $\tilde{\mathfrak{g}}=\{(g,B)\in\mathfrak{g}\times G/B\vert g\in Lie(B)\}$
Sep 17, 2016 at 17:27 review Suggested edits
Sep 17, 2016 at 17:37
Sep 17, 2016 at 17:19 history edited Ben Webster CC BY-SA 3.0
added 41 characters in body
Sep 17, 2016 at 16:49 comment added SashaP Probably $\mathfrak{g}$ should be replaced by the nilpotent cone of it.
Sep 17, 2016 at 16:02 comment added abx What do you call the Springer resolution of $\mathfrak{g}$? $\mathfrak{g}$ is smooth.
Sep 17, 2016 at 15:56 comment added SashaP Don't you need to shift by $-\dim\mathfrak g$ to make it perverse?
Sep 17, 2016 at 15:34 history asked prochet CC BY-SA 3.0