Timeline for Bass' stable range of $\mathbf Z[X]$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 18, 2018 at 10:04 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Makes the comment about the "harmless" glitch in Addendum more precise
|
Feb 17, 2018 at 22:55 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Uses parentheses for sake of consistency
|
Feb 17, 2018 at 22:49 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixes typo in the definition of $\mathcal{O}$
|
Feb 17, 2018 at 21:37 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Explains what's wrong with Proof of Proposition 1.9 of Grunewald et al. AND retracts the claim about the $\mathbb{Z}[X^{\pm 1}]$.
|
Oct 27, 2016 at 18:25 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed typo
|
Sep 21, 2016 at 17:43 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected the example of non-reducible row in the case of Laurent polynomials over Z
|
Sep 21, 2016 at 16:24 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added example of a non-reducible row for the case of the univariate Laurent polynomials over $\mathbf{Z}$
|
Sep 18, 2016 at 17:46 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed statement about surjectivity which is far less general than what was claimed earlier.
|
Sep 18, 2016 at 17:03 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected power residue symbol: this is a quadratic residue
|
Sep 18, 2016 at 16:17 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed 2 typos related to names
|
Sep 18, 2016 at 9:52 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed typo in referred author's name, plus minor rewording
|
Sep 18, 2016 at 6:21 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected an argument in the proof of the lemma: finiteness is not guaranteed whereas Artinian is just enough.
|
Sep 17, 2016 at 14:28 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Makes the definition of the ideal $I$ explicit.
|
Sep 17, 2016 at 12:19 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed typo: redundancy of "in the exact sequence" , plus replacements of $R$ by $S$ in the exact sequence.
|
Sep 17, 2016 at 12:13 | history | answered | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |