Skip to main content
Prydham -> Pridham
Source Link
Matthieu Romagny
  • 4.5k
  • 1
  • 31
  • 37

The deformation theoretic principle that any reasonable deformation problem should be governed by a dg-Lie algebra seems to come from a letter of Deligne to Millson. It is clear how the Maurer-Cartan formalism indeed produces a deformation problem and conversely for most deformation problems the dg-Lie algebra is well known. In the derived setting this principle has even become a theorem following Lurie-PrydhamPridham. However, I was wondering if anyone could explain the original intuition Deligne had behind this principle?

The deformation theoretic principle that any reasonable deformation problem should be governed by a dg-Lie algebra seems to come from a letter of Deligne to Millson. It is clear how the Maurer-Cartan formalism indeed produces a deformation problem and conversely for most deformation problems the dg-Lie algebra is well known. In the derived setting this principle has even become a theorem following Lurie-Prydham. However, I was wondering if anyone could explain the original intuition Deligne had behind this principle?

The deformation theoretic principle that any reasonable deformation problem should be governed by a dg-Lie algebra seems to come from a letter of Deligne to Millson. It is clear how the Maurer-Cartan formalism indeed produces a deformation problem and conversely for most deformation problems the dg-Lie algebra is well known. In the derived setting this principle has even become a theorem following Lurie-Pridham. However, I was wondering if anyone could explain the original intuition Deligne had behind this principle?

Source Link
Diane
  • 211
  • 1
  • 2

Deligne's letter to Millson

The deformation theoretic principle that any reasonable deformation problem should be governed by a dg-Lie algebra seems to come from a letter of Deligne to Millson. It is clear how the Maurer-Cartan formalism indeed produces a deformation problem and conversely for most deformation problems the dg-Lie algebra is well known. In the derived setting this principle has even become a theorem following Lurie-Prydham. However, I was wondering if anyone could explain the original intuition Deligne had behind this principle?