Timeline for A single paper everyone should read?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2012 at 16:47 | comment | added | David Corwin | what's going on for real I want to interpret that as a pun | |
| May 31, 2010 at 17:20 | comment | added | Timothy Chow | @Richard: In the paper I do mention that infinitary set theory is not needed for forcing and that a purely finitary proof is possible; I don't think I say anywhere that standard models are necessary. However, since you got that erroneous impression, presumably other readers will too, so it's good to clear up that point explicitly. | |
| Oct 26, 2009 at 20:15 | comment | added | Richard Dore | This is a nice high level summary. One objection I'd have is that it suggests that standard models are necessary, rather than a convenience. An Introduction to Independence for Analysts by Dales and Woodin clears this up, as well as being a more thorough introduction to the subject designed for non-set-theorists. However, it is unfortunately out of print. | |
| Oct 25, 2009 at 19:33 | comment | added | Steven Gubkin | I have to upvote this one because I am in the acknowledgments! It is a seriously good intro to an often neglected subject area. | |
| Oct 25, 2009 at 19:20 | history | answered | subshift | CC BY-SA 2.5 |