Skip to main content
its
Source Link
Allen Knutson
  • 27.8k
  • 4
  • 54
  • 152

Regarding interpretations of eigenvalues, I recall that the spectra of a graph can tell you if it is bipartite. I think a connected graph is bipartite if and only if $-\lambda$ is one of it'sits eigenvalues (here $\lambda$ is the largest eigenvalue). Please correct me if I've muddled the theorem.

Regarding interpretations of eigenvalues, I recall that the spectra of a graph can tell you if it is bipartite. I think a connected graph is bipartite if and only if $-\lambda$ is one of it's eigenvalues (here $\lambda$ is the largest eigenvalue). Please correct me if I've muddled the theorem.

Regarding interpretations of eigenvalues, I recall that the spectra of a graph can tell you if it is bipartite. I think a connected graph is bipartite if and only if $-\lambda$ is one of its eigenvalues (here $\lambda$ is the largest eigenvalue). Please correct me if I've muddled the theorem.

Source Link
Tony Huynh
  • 32.1k
  • 11
  • 112
  • 187

Regarding interpretations of eigenvalues, I recall that the spectra of a graph can tell you if it is bipartite. I think a connected graph is bipartite if and only if $-\lambda$ is one of it's eigenvalues (here $\lambda$ is the largest eigenvalue). Please correct me if I've muddled the theorem.