Timeline for Two points of view about Borel-moore homology
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2016 at 7:56 | vote | accept | C. Dubussy | ||
| Sep 10, 2016 at 9:27 | comment | added | C. Dubussy | So actually, all the proof was indeed in Bredon. As you said, what a nightmare ! Thank you very much for this complete answer, I'll read it more carefully monday at work and then I'll accept it. | |
| Sep 10, 2016 at 5:20 | history | edited | Greg Friedman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5664 characters in body
|
| Sep 10, 2016 at 2:51 | comment | added | Greg Friedman | Oops, thanks for the reminder that I need to continue thinking about this. I realized that I might not have ever thought this through for spaces that aren't manifolds or pseudomanifolds, but I'll let you know if I come up with something. | |
| Sep 8, 2016 at 19:12 | comment | added | C. Dubussy | Thanks for this answer, I'm impatient to read your further developments but these have already given interesting ideas. As you said, in the case of manifolds with orientation sheaf, things are easier and we can by the way find some books that treat this case. (At least partially.) | |
| Sep 8, 2016 at 12:13 | history | answered | Greg Friedman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |