Timeline for On a reflecting Brownian motion and its boundary local time
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Apr 27, 2019 at 18:46 | history | suggested | Blade | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
grammer correction
|
| Apr 27, 2019 at 17:32 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 27, 2019 at 18:46 | |||||
| Sep 3, 2016 at 20:12 | vote | accept | sharpe | ||
| Sep 3, 2016 at 7:35 | vote | accept | sharpe | ||
| Sep 3, 2016 at 7:41 | |||||
| Sep 2, 2016 at 19:39 | answer | added | Nawaf Bou-Rabee | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 2, 2016 at 14:10 | history | edited | sharpe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 661 characters in body
|
| Sep 2, 2016 at 14:08 | comment | added | Nawaf Bou-Rabee | Unfortunately, that addendum doesn't address my concern. Unless I am missing something, your question about RBM is essentially 1D and should be stated as such. | |
| Sep 2, 2016 at 14:06 | comment | added | sharpe | For the moment, I tried to clarify my question. | |
| Sep 2, 2016 at 14:03 | history | edited | sharpe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 661 characters in body
|
| Sep 2, 2016 at 12:32 | comment | added | Nawaf Bou-Rabee | In the Neumann case, the components of the RBM are completely decoupled. Therefore, I do not understand the point of the second component. Please clarify. | |
| Sep 2, 2016 at 10:33 | comment | added | user83457 | Is this process independent 1 d processes reflected at an upper & lower boundary? | |
| Sep 2, 2016 at 7:27 | history | edited | sharpe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 89 characters in body
|
| Sep 2, 2016 at 7:14 | comment | added | sharpe | Thank you for pointing it out. $X_t$ is a Brownian motion in $D$ with normal reflection at the boundary. | |
| Sep 1, 2016 at 18:55 | comment | added | Nawaf Bou-Rabee | Can you please specify the reflection (or constraint) directions? Otherwise your description of the reflecting Brownian motion is a bit incomplete. | |
| Sep 1, 2016 at 18:43 | history | asked | sharpe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |