Timeline for How do you show that $S^{\infty}$ is contractible?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 21, 2022 at 11:33 | comment | added | FShrike | @IvanDiLiberti I regret to inform you I'm no longer sure if that is even true. A user on MSE commented, under my linked question, that we could make it work. For a time, I thought I'd figured it out, but I hadn't... | |
Dec 21, 2022 at 9:27 | comment | added | Ivan Di Liberti | @FShrike ahah, thanks! | |
Dec 21, 2022 at 9:26 | comment | added | FShrike | @IvanDiLiberti It is surprising and possibly even false. But if we further assume the existence of at least one point in $A_0$ that makes it a well-pointed space, then we can have the result. | |
Dec 21, 2022 at 9:23 | comment | added | FShrike | @YTS I asked about how to amend this, on MSE here. With two sets of slightly stronger hypotheses, we can make it work, and that’s just so far. Maybe someone will find a way to make this proof always work | |
Apr 24, 2019 at 14:26 | comment | added | YTS | Why the map $f$ reach just one point when $f_1$? It seems like in principle is just a sequence of points $x_n=\alpha_n(1)\circ \cdots \alpha_1(1)$ | |
S Nov 18, 2018 at 17:28 | history | suggested | Lilalas | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improve formatting
|
Nov 18, 2018 at 17:01 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Nov 18, 2018 at 17:28 | |||||
Nov 5, 2017 at 17:30 | comment | added | Ivan Di Liberti | This is just surprising. Can I suggest you to improve the notation? It is a bit confusing. | |
Oct 2, 2016 at 2:56 | history | edited | Hari Rau-Murthy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 47 characters in body
|
Aug 28, 2016 at 2:16 | history | edited | Hari Rau-Murthy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 191 characters in body
|
Aug 28, 2016 at 2:09 | history | answered | Hari Rau-Murthy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |