Timeline for Broken families
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2016 at 17:15 | comment | added | Asaf Karagila♦ | Ohh, now I understand the idea entirely (I thought you redefined a new family entirely. I missed the $\gamma\in[\kappa,\kappa^+)$ part). Thanks! | |
| Aug 25, 2016 at 17:11 | comment | added | Chris Lambie-Hanson | The $A_\alpha$'s for $\alpha < \kappa$ are the original $A_\alpha$'s that partition $\kappa$. I only used $\vec{f}$ to define $A_\alpha$ for $\alpha \in [\kappa, \kappa^+)$, so I think the notation is at least correct, if possibly confusing. | |
| Aug 25, 2016 at 17:06 | comment | added | Asaf Karagila♦ | I think that you've used $A_\alpha$ too many times. Nice construction! At least this reaffirms the idea that you can't immediately argue that a MAD family is broken. | |
| Aug 25, 2016 at 17:01 | history | answered | Chris Lambie-Hanson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |