Timeline for Unknown bias in a distribution related to prime numbers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2016 at 7:03 | vote | accept | Nilotpal Kanti Sinha | ||
| Sep 6, 2016 at 7:03 | |||||
| Aug 25, 2016 at 15:52 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | You might consider gathering more data for larger $x$. I note that prime power values for the number of nondivisors are also relatively low. You might be able to explain the distribution by looking at the distribution of the relative block sizes (compare the exponents in the factorizations of n-1 and gcd(n-1,\phi(n))). Gerhard "Data Isn't Always Number Shaped" Paseman, 2016.08.25. | |
| Aug 25, 2016 at 15:40 | history | edited | Gerhard Paseman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 46 characters in body
|
| Aug 25, 2016 at 15:35 | history | answered | Gerhard Paseman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |