Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 18, 2018 at 23:48 answer added Evgeny Goncharov timeline score: 5
Apr 24, 2018 at 17:08 answer added Evgeny Goncharov timeline score: 4
Sep 18, 2016 at 18:35 vote accept CommunityBot
Sep 3, 2016 at 8:52 answer added user19475 timeline score: 3
Aug 31, 2016 at 20:49 answer added tttbase timeline score: 5
Aug 23, 2016 at 13:50 answer added tttbase timeline score: 5
Aug 23, 2016 at 7:17 answer added Steven Landsburg timeline score: 14
Aug 23, 2016 at 1:59 answer added Daniel Hast timeline score: 12
Aug 23, 2016 at 0:26 comment added Hoot I take it that the book of Freitag-Kiehl has been dismissed?
Aug 23, 2016 at 0:09 history edited user97565 CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Aug 23, 2016 at 0:02 history edited user97565 CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 19 characters in body
Aug 22, 2016 at 23:58 comment added user97565 @FelipeVoloch I'm perfectly fine with using étale cohomology as a black box. I've removed the "self-contained" stipulation from my original post.
Aug 22, 2016 at 23:35 comment added Felipe Voloch For 1. Koblitz's book p-adic Numbers, p-adic Analysis, and Zeta-Functions gives Dwork's proof in a fairly straightforward way. For 2-4, unless you are happy using etale cohomology as a black box, it inevitably takes a long time to develop. Maybe these days the proof using crystalline cohomology is shorter, but I doubt it.
Aug 22, 2016 at 23:10 answer added Igor Rivin timeline score: 14
Aug 22, 2016 at 23:02 review First posts
Aug 23, 2016 at 1:30
Aug 22, 2016 at 22:54 history asked user97565 CC BY-SA 3.0