Skip to main content

Timeline for Fermat's opponents

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 20, 2016 at 17:01 vote accept Mikhail Katz
Aug 19, 2016 at 5:36 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Truly deserved bounty, if I've ever seen one! However - Kazantsev... бррр :D
Aug 19, 2016 at 5:26 history edited Zurab Silagadze CC BY-SA 3.0
more links added
Aug 18, 2016 at 13:14 history bounty ended Mikhail Katz
Aug 18, 2016 at 6:40 vote accept Mikhail Katz
Aug 18, 2016 at 13:14
Aug 11, 2016 at 9:12 history edited Zurab Silagadze CC BY-SA 3.0
Links added
Aug 10, 2016 at 15:03 comment added Mikhail Katz Historians are fond of accusing each other of whiggish history so this aspect is best ignored. Weil's criticism of Mahoney's take on Fermat's adequality is well-taken.
Aug 10, 2016 at 14:39 comment added Joël Weil's review of Mahoneys book on Fermat 's excellent and worth reading fro anyone interested in these questions. Michael Harris sharply criticizes it (and Weil's general attitude about historians of mathematics) in his blog post linked by Zurab, but he does not really give any argument against it.
Aug 10, 2016 at 7:40 history edited Zurab Silagadze CC BY-SA 3.0
added 151 characters in body
Aug 10, 2016 at 7:36 history undeleted Zurab Silagadze
Aug 10, 2016 at 3:26 history deleted Zurab Silagadze via Vote
Aug 9, 2016 at 22:52 comment added Gerry Myerson Weil wrote a scathing review of Mahoney's book, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. Volume 79, Number 6 (1973), 1138-1149, also available from projecteuclid.org/euclid.bams/1183535132
Aug 9, 2016 at 15:51 comment added Yemon Choi The second paragraph looks useful. Perhaps I am being slow, but could you explain why the first paragraph is relevant to understanding the intellectual and sociological history of Fermat and his intellectual/ mathematical milieu?
Aug 9, 2016 at 13:32 comment added Mikhail Katz I like that article a lot :-)
Aug 9, 2016 at 13:31 history answered Zurab Silagadze CC BY-SA 3.0