Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 7, 2016 at 14:14 comment added Joseph O'Rourke @ToddTrimble: I think nonconvexity introduces significant complications. Not certain of the status. Might be unsolved.
Aug 7, 2016 at 14:09 comment added Todd Trimble Okay, thanks, that's helpful! On the second page it seems to indicate that no set of three directions will suffice, but there are sets of four directions which will work for all curves with convex interior. Would that extend to all simple closed curves, convex or not?
Aug 7, 2016 at 14:02 history edited Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 3.0
added 302 characters in body
Aug 7, 2016 at 14:00 comment added Joseph O'Rourke @ToddTrimble: This is a version of "Hammer’s X-ray reconstruction problem." I will edit my response.
Aug 7, 2016 at 13:57 comment added Todd Trimble Yes... but now choose a third direction. I thought the question was asking if there are a finite number of directions we could choose that would determine the curve. (Admittedly, the question could stand some more clarification.)
Aug 7, 2016 at 13:54 comment added Joseph O'Rourke @ToddTrimble: You are right; I misinterpreted. Then rotate the blue rays $90^\circ$. They yield the same length intersections. So two directions do not always suffice.
Aug 7, 2016 at 13:52 comment added Todd Trimble My understanding is that we are supposed to consider lengths coming from multiple directions, not just the ones from segments parallel to the y-axis.
Aug 7, 2016 at 13:50 comment added Joseph O'Rourke @ToddTrimble: Unless I misunderstand the question, one cannot reconstruct $S$ from the lengths of parallel ray intersections.
Aug 7, 2016 at 13:48 comment added Todd Trimble But to what extent does this answer the question?
Aug 7, 2016 at 13:47 history answered Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 3.0