Skip to main content
added 119 characters in body
Source Link
Ben Webster
  • 44.7k
  • 12
  • 126
  • 260

A very well-known condition is that the Hilbert scheme of a smooth surface is smooth (I believe also. As David pointed out below, the Hilbert scheme of a smooth curve is smooth and equal to the symmetric product (since k[t] has only one finite dimension quotient of each dimension).

I don't know of any other examples, but one of the versions of Murphy's Law in algebraic geometry is roughly "if you don't have a good reason for a Hilbert scheme to not be horrible, it will be as horrible as you can possibly imagine."

A very well-known condition is that the Hilbert scheme of a smooth surface is smooth (I believe also the Hilbert scheme of a smooth curve is smooth).

I don't know of any other examples, but one of the versions of Murphy's Law in algebraic geometry is roughly "if you don't have a good reason for a Hilbert scheme to not be horrible, it will be as horrible as you can possibly imagine."

A very well-known condition is that the Hilbert scheme of a smooth surface is smooth. As David pointed out below, the Hilbert scheme of a smooth curve is smooth and equal to the symmetric product (since k[t] has only one finite dimension quotient of each dimension).

I don't know of any other examples, but one of the versions of Murphy's Law in algebraic geometry is roughly "if you don't have a good reason for a Hilbert scheme to not be horrible, it will be as horrible as you can possibly imagine."

Source Link
Ben Webster
  • 44.7k
  • 12
  • 126
  • 260

A very well-known condition is that the Hilbert scheme of a smooth surface is smooth (I believe also the Hilbert scheme of a smooth curve is smooth).

I don't know of any other examples, but one of the versions of Murphy's Law in algebraic geometry is roughly "if you don't have a good reason for a Hilbert scheme to not be horrible, it will be as horrible as you can possibly imagine."