Timeline for Pascal triangle and prime numbers
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2023 at 8:20 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
http -> https (the question was bumped anyway)
|
| Jan 4, 2017 at 13:16 | comment | added | André Henriques | Yes. I agree with you. Note however that my unusual convention does not affect the meaning of the q-binomial coefficients. | |
| Dec 25, 2016 at 15:15 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | I think the $q$-factorial is ordinarily defined to be the polynomial $\prod_{i=1}^n \frac{1 - q^i}{1 - q}$. The $F_{un}$ rule of thumb is that you get the usual factorials (binomial coefficients, etc.) by letting $q \to 1$, right? | |
| May 14, 2010 at 18:00 | history | answered | André Henriques | CC BY-SA 2.5 |