Skip to main content
fixed broken link to planetmath.org; replaced Unicode symbols with MathJax
Source Link

Let S$S$ be a subset of the reals such that S∩[a,b]$S \cap [a,b]$ and Sc∩[a,b]$S^c \cap [a,b]$ cannot be written as a countable union of closed sets for any a<b$a < b$. This can be done (this explicit example of a non-Borel setexplicit example of a non-Borel set achieves this). Let $\mathbb{Q}$ be the rationals. Then, A=(Sxℚ)U(Scxℚc)$A = (S \times \mathbb{Q}) \cup (S^c \times \mathbb{Q}^c)$ and B=(Sxℚc)U(Scxℚ)$B = (S \times \mathbb{Q}^c) \cup (S^c \times \mathbb{Q})$ should do it.

The proof is as follows. Suppose that the curve t→(f(t),g(t))$t \to (f(t),g(t))$ lies in A$A$, and consider a closed bounded interval I$I$. As the curve lies in A$A$, f(I)∩S = f(I∩g-1(ℚ))=∪x∈ℚf(I∩g-1(x))$$f(I) \cap S = f(I \cap g^{-1}(\mathbb{Q})) = \bigcup_{x \in \mathbb{Q}} f(I \cap g^{-1}(x))$$ is a union of countably many closed sets. By the choice of S$S$, f(I)$f(I)$ must be a single point. Hence, f$f$ is constant. Then, g$g$ is a continuous function mapping into either $\mathbb{Q}$ or c$\mathbb{Q}^c$, so is also constant. So A$A$ is totally path disconnected. The argument for B$B$ follows in the same way by exchanging S$S$ and Sc$S^c$.

Let S be a subset of the reals such that S∩[a,b] and Sc∩[a,b] cannot be written as a countable union of closed sets for any a<b. This can be done (this explicit example of a non-Borel set achieves this). Let be the rationals. Then, A=(Sxℚ)U(Scxℚc) and B=(Sxℚc)U(Scxℚ) should do it.

The proof is as follows. Suppose that the curve t→(f(t),g(t)) lies in A, and consider a closed bounded interval I. As the curve lies in A, f(I)∩S = f(I∩g-1(ℚ))=∪x∈ℚf(I∩g-1(x)) is a union of countably many closed sets. By the choice of S, f(I) must be a single point. Hence, f is constant. Then, g is a continuous function mapping into either or c, so is also constant. So A is totally path disconnected. The argument for B follows in the same way by exchanging S and Sc

Let $S$ be a subset of the reals such that $S \cap [a,b]$ and $S^c \cap [a,b]$ cannot be written as a countable union of closed sets for any $a < b$. This can be done (this explicit example of a non-Borel set achieves this). Let $\mathbb{Q}$ be the rationals. Then, $A = (S \times \mathbb{Q}) \cup (S^c \times \mathbb{Q}^c)$ and $B = (S \times \mathbb{Q}^c) \cup (S^c \times \mathbb{Q})$ should do it.

The proof is as follows. Suppose that the curve $t \to (f(t),g(t))$ lies in $A$, and consider a closed bounded interval $I$. As the curve lies in $A$, $$f(I) \cap S = f(I \cap g^{-1}(\mathbb{Q})) = \bigcup_{x \in \mathbb{Q}} f(I \cap g^{-1}(x))$$ is a union of countably many closed sets. By the choice of $S$, $f(I)$ must be a single point. Hence, $f$ is constant. Then, $g$ is a continuous function mapping into either $\mathbb{Q}$ or $\mathbb{Q}^c$, so is also constant. So $A$ is totally path disconnected. The argument for $B$ follows in the same way by exchanging $S$ and $S^c$.

typo
Source Link
George Lowther
  • 17.1k
  • 1
  • 66
  • 98

Let S be a subset of the reals such that S∩[a,b] and Sc∩[a,b] cannot be written as a countable union of closed sets for any a<b. This can be done (this explicit example of a non-Borel set achieves this). Let ℚ be the rationals. Then, A=(Sxℚ)U(Scxℚc) and B=(Sxℚc)U(Scxℚ) should do it.

The proof is as follows. Suppose that the curve t→(f(t),g(t)) lies in A, and consider a closed bounded interval I. As the curve lies in A, f(I)∩S = f(I∩g-1(ℚ))=∪x∈ℚf(I∩g-1(x)) is a union of countably many closed sets. By the choice of S, f(I) must be a single point. Hence, f is constant. Then, g is a continuous function mapping ontointo either ℚ or ℚc, so is also constant. So A is totally path disconnected. The argument for B follows in the same way by exchanging S and Sc

Let S be a subset of the reals such that S∩[a,b] and Sc∩[a,b] cannot be written as a countable union of closed sets for any a<b. This can be done (this explicit example of a non-Borel set achieves this). Let ℚ be the rationals. Then, A=(Sxℚ)U(Scxℚc) and B=(Sxℚc)U(Scxℚ) should do it.

The proof is as follows. Suppose that the curve t→(f(t),g(t)) lies in A, and consider a closed bounded interval I. As the curve lies in A, f(I)∩S = f(I∩g-1(ℚ))=∪x∈ℚf(I∩g-1(x)) is a union of countably many closed sets. By the choice of S, f(I) must be a single point. Hence, f is constant. Then, g is a continuous function mapping onto either ℚ or ℚc, so is also constant. So A is totally path disconnected. The argument for B follows in the same way by exchanging S and Sc

Let S be a subset of the reals such that S∩[a,b] and Sc∩[a,b] cannot be written as a countable union of closed sets for any a<b. This can be done (this explicit example of a non-Borel set achieves this). Let ℚ be the rationals. Then, A=(Sxℚ)U(Scxℚc) and B=(Sxℚc)U(Scxℚ) should do it.

The proof is as follows. Suppose that the curve t→(f(t),g(t)) lies in A, and consider a closed bounded interval I. As the curve lies in A, f(I)∩S = f(I∩g-1(ℚ))=∪x∈ℚf(I∩g-1(x)) is a union of countably many closed sets. By the choice of S, f(I) must be a single point. Hence, f is constant. Then, g is a continuous function mapping into either ℚ or ℚc, so is also constant. So A is totally path disconnected. The argument for B follows in the same way by exchanging S and Sc

add proof
Source Link
George Lowther
  • 17.1k
  • 1
  • 66
  • 98

Let S be a subset of the reals such that S∩[a,b] and Sc∩[a,b] cannot be written as a countable union of closed sets for any a<b. This can be done (this explicit example of a non-Borel set achieves this). Let ℚ be the rationals. Then, A=(Sxℚ)U(Scxℚc) and B=(Sxℚc)U(Scxℚ) should do it.

The proof is as follows. Suppose that the curve t→(f(t),g(t)) lies in A, and consider a closed bounded interval I. As the curve lies in A, f(I)∩S = f(I∩g-1(ℚ))=∪x∈ℚf(I∩g-1(x)) is a union of countably many closed sets. By the choice of S, f(I) must be a single point. Hence, f is constant. Then, g is a continuous function mapping onto either ℚ or ℚc, so is also constant. So A is totally path disconnected. The argument for B follows in the same way by exchanging S and Sc

Let S be a subset of the reals such that S∩[a,b] and Sc∩[a,b] cannot be written as a countable union of closed sets for any a<b. This can be done (this explicit example of a non-Borel set achieves this). Let ℚ be the rationals. Then, A=(Sxℚ)U(Scxℚc) and B=(Sxℚc)U(Scxℚ) should do it.

Let S be a subset of the reals such that S∩[a,b] and Sc∩[a,b] cannot be written as a countable union of closed sets for any a<b. This can be done (this explicit example of a non-Borel set achieves this). Let ℚ be the rationals. Then, A=(Sxℚ)U(Scxℚc) and B=(Sxℚc)U(Scxℚ) should do it.

The proof is as follows. Suppose that the curve t→(f(t),g(t)) lies in A, and consider a closed bounded interval I. As the curve lies in A, f(I)∩S = f(I∩g-1(ℚ))=∪x∈ℚf(I∩g-1(x)) is a union of countably many closed sets. By the choice of S, f(I) must be a single point. Hence, f is constant. Then, g is a continuous function mapping onto either ℚ or ℚc, so is also constant. So A is totally path disconnected. The argument for B follows in the same way by exchanging S and Sc

Source Link
George Lowther
  • 17.1k
  • 1
  • 66
  • 98
Loading