Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 2, 2016 at 16:35 comment added Bobby Grizzard If a CAS can do it, I guess a hand can do it, although my hands don't have much experience in the matter. Probably you do some kind of descent/ Selmer group calculation?
Aug 2, 2016 at 14:02 comment added Pablo @BobbyGrizzard and could you prove by hand that the rank is zero?
Aug 2, 2016 at 13:52 comment added Bobby Grizzard @pablo I just mean that the CAS can compute whole Mordell-Weil group over of the elliptic curve $\mathbb{Q}$. Apparently the group only has 3 points. To figure out what the torsion looks like by hand, you'd have to do some work, but these techniques are well-known.
Aug 2, 2016 at 6:39 comment added Pablo @BobbyGrizzard how do you know that only the $3$-torsion points are defined over $\mathbb{Q}$? Why (say) there is no $5$-torsion?
Aug 1, 2016 at 22:50 comment added Bobby Grizzard Maybe it's worth pointing out that, even if one did not realize it was isomorphic to the Fermat curve, one could discover quickly using a CAS that the elliptic curve has rank 0, and then that the only rational points were the obvious ones (which I guess are 3-torsion points).
Aug 1, 2016 at 18:18 comment added Jeremy Rouse @Pablo and Wojowu - I used Magma, and knew off the top of my head that $y^{2} + y = x^{3} - 7$, one elliptic curve with conductor $27$, is isomorphic to the Fermat cubic.
Aug 1, 2016 at 18:17 comment added Wojowu @Pablo This is a rather wild guess, but I suppose some computer algebra system (e.g. Sage) can find the isomorphisms.
Aug 1, 2016 at 18:14 vote accept Pablo
Aug 1, 2016 at 18:11 comment added Pablo @JeremyRouse Maybe this is an inappropriate question, but how did you know so quickly that this is going to be isomorphic to a Fermat curve? Have yous just played with the equations or is there some theory/criterion behind this?
Aug 1, 2016 at 18:02 comment added Jeremy Rouse The isomorphism from $3y^2z = 4x^3 - z^3$ to $X^3 + Y^3 = Z^3$ is given by $X = (y-z)/2$, $Y = x$ and $Z = (y+z)/2$.
Aug 1, 2016 at 17:55 comment added Pablo @WhatsUp Right! But how do I show that the curves are isomorphic over the rationals?
Aug 1, 2016 at 17:53 comment added WhatsUp It doesn't necessarily give a bijection between integral points. But the NON-EXISTENCE of other rational points on one curve immediately implies the non-existence of other rational points on the other curve, and a fortiori the non-existence of other integral points.
Aug 1, 2016 at 17:48 comment added Pablo What would an isomorphism over $\mathbb{Q}$ look like? And why does it necessarily give a bijection between integral points?
Aug 1, 2016 at 17:45 history answered Jeremy Rouse CC BY-SA 3.0