Timeline for Paging Henryk Iwaniec: Problems In Lemma 1?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2016 at 5:47 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | As another hint (element of confusion), the Delta's are defined so that for this part of the proof $\delta_m \geq \sum_{n \mid m} \mu(n)$ for all $m \mid P$. I am guessing the $m$ are positive and $\mu()$ is the Möbius function, which would make the Delta's all nonegative, with $\delta_1 \geq 1$. Gerhard "Can Use Some Expert Help" Paseman, 2016.07.31. | |
| Aug 1, 2016 at 5:01 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | No problem. Call up someone on MathOverflow at Rutgers. Gerhard "Hopefully They're Already Reading This" Paseman, 2016.07.31. | |
| Aug 1, 2016 at 4:59 | comment | added | Felipe Voloch | That was easy. Tate's office was down the hall from mine at the time. I told him about the question and, when he went to MO and answered, it was too good for me to say anything. I can't do that with Iwaniec, sorry. | |
| Aug 1, 2016 at 4:43 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | If he responds on MathOverflow, I will have you to thank for that, Felipe. Gerhard "Remember The John Tate Summons?" Paseman, 2016.07.31. | |
| Aug 1, 2016 at 4:32 | comment | added | Felipe Voloch | Hahaha, Iwaniec on the Internet. Good luck with that. | |
| Aug 1, 2016 at 3:54 | history | asked | Gerhard Paseman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |