Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 31, 2018 at 13:11 comment added Mikhail Bondarko Possibly this is a stupid question; sorry! I have to think more about this.
Jul 31, 2018 at 10:11 comment added Mikhail Bondarko Thank you very much indeed! It turns out that the the Burnside rings is not quite what I want. I am rather interested in the direct sum of all $Mor_{SH_G} (\Sigma_G (G/H_1)_+, \Sigma_G (G/H_2)_+)$ for $H_i$ running through all subgroups of $G$. This is a ring (with a unit if $G$ is finite) with multiplication given by compositions of morphisms, and I wonder whether anybody has considered it previously.
Jul 4, 2018 at 3:06 comment added Peter May @Mikhail Bondarko. This is discussed in Section V.2 of the reference in my answer. Just click! For finite $G$, Segal first noticed that $\pi_0(S)$ is the Burnside ring of $G$. For compact Lie groups, tom Dieck defined the Burnside ring of $G$ in such a way that the same conclusion holds. For finite $G$, much more is true. Running through $\pi_0$ of the suspension $G$-spectra of orbits $G/H$ (with disjoint basepoints), one obtains the Burnside ring Mackey functor, and more recent work shows that there are multiplicative norms so that one actually obtains the Burnside ring Tambara functor.
Jun 20, 2018 at 8:32 comment added Mikhail Bondarko So, I have had a look at you book, and I have found references that give the vanishing in question. However, I believe that for $i=0$ the corresponding groups should be related to the Burnside ring of $G$; still I wasn't able to find any reference that gives this statement. I would be deeply grateful for any advice here!
Aug 1, 2016 at 1:06 comment added Peter May Yeah, I'm sorry it is so lengthy, and pre tex.
Jul 31, 2016 at 14:41 comment added Mikhail Bondarko Thank you very much! So, everything "works in the way I want it to"; I only have to read you book thoroughfully.
Jul 31, 2016 at 14:39 vote accept Mikhail Bondarko
Jul 30, 2016 at 23:28 history answered Peter May CC BY-SA 3.0